Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment That's pretty much the idea (Score 5, Insightful) 116

You're not supposed to control your appliance! If you would, you could not only fix them instead of replacing them, you could find new applications for them instead of buying another, specialized, one. And the maker could not at will end its life so you'd be buying the next one, bigger and better than your old 6 month old ancient garbage.

It's not a bug. It's a feature.

Comment Re:Good job guys (Score 1) 276

This, and a billion times this.

9/11 would NOT have worked out if the drill for hijackings had not been "cooperate and nobody gets hurt". Today the pilot's capsule is locked. And no matter what kind of threat you would bring to the table, the pilot will NOT unlock it. Kill a hostage? Do it. If I open, you kill us all. Kill ALL hostages? Do it. If I open, I die too.

There is NOTHING you could threaten a pilot with to make him open the door. He actually has the ORDER not to cooperate with you, so there is not even going to be any kind of repercussion against him if you skin everyone in the back alive.

9/11 worked once, because the safety procedures concerning hijackings operated on a false premise. They don't anymore.

Comment Re:Good job guys (Score 1) 276

I can understand why they are forbidden, but if I read your post correctly they are utterly useless for a terrorist attack. If it incapacitates the attacker itself, it better be a (suicide) bomb, i.e. the attack itself being carried out by the time the device is set off. You don't accomplish much in terms of terrorism by incapacitating a plane full of people (hint: the pilots don't really get any of it, so the plane keeps flying, though I could be inconvenienced if the flight attendants are out of order and I can't get my soda, oh the humanity!).

Comment Re:You want a family friendly internet? (Score 1) 294

There is exactly one person in this whole wide world whose judgement about content and its appropriateness for me I will accept: MINE. There is exactly NO other person, organization, entity or being in existence that can successfully convince me that they should have any kind of say concerning my consumption of entertainment.

Personally, I consider a whole lot of shit inappropriate for consumption. Most of daytime TV comes to mind. Almost 99% of music is right behind it. And guess what, I make that decision for myself that it is inappropriate. For ME. Everyone else, I certainly do NOT think I have the right to dictate what they may or may not see, hear or for all I care smell.

That's THEIR decision. Not mine.

And it for fuck's sake certainly ain't any politician's!

Comment Re:and that's how we got the world of FIREFLY (Score 1) 265

seriously though, the Chinese can destroy our country without setting a single boot on the ground simply through economic measures.

The problem is that would also destroy them economically at the same time as they require US consumers to buy all the crap they produce. China keep their own currency artificially low just to keep their exports going.

Slashdot Top Deals

For God's sake, stop researching for a while and begin to think!

Working...