Comment Re:because: Republicans (Score 2, Insightful) 81
No fan of the Republicans here, but enforcement is the Executive Branch's bailiwick.
No fan of the Republicans here, but enforcement is the Executive Branch's bailiwick.
Pretty sure you need a massive lobbying brigade in order to qualify for Safe Harbor protections.
I've noticed that the "report this kickstarter" links that the support pages refer to no longer exist, either.
... you complaining while he plugs his ears and yells LA LA LA LA LA. XD
I think you've misspelled 'United States' in your post, there.
Yep. Cut those social services, but boy do we need some new, untested, and buggy-as-hell jet fighters.
Actually, Canada does have nuclear weapons, after a fashion. IIRC there are some located on US military bases in Canadian territory, to be released to Canadian control in the event of
Actually, you're entirely wrong. Subatomic particles of the same type are fundamentally indistinguishable from each other.
It's called 'spoilation inference', and actually works kinda like that. Not so much an automatic guilty as "the destroyed evidence shows conscience of guilt and therefore strongly supports the opposing side".
That's... sort of how it works, but not exactly. Depending on the jurisdiction involved, this leads to 'spoilation inference', where the destroyed evidence is considered 'conscience of guilt' and the court will consider the destroyed evidence as strongly against the spoiling party.
He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion