Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Overclocking BS (Score 1) 159

The reason these overclocks are significant is that the Phenom wasn't able to reach the clock speeds that AMD originally expected it to, and that's one of the reasons it's had such a hard time competing with the Core 2. They were expecting to be selling 3 GHz Phenoms soon after launch, but the first Phenoms to ship were only 2.3 GHz, and even now the fastest Phenom chip is a 2.6 GHz part that struggles to overclock much past 3 GHz or so regardless of the cooling that's used. Even though clock speed by itself isn't a good indicator of performance, especially when comparing different architectures, if a processor was designed to be competitive at 3 GHz and they're only able to get it to 2.6 GHz reliably, that's a big problem.

If AMD has solved their clock speed limitation issues with the Phenom 2, that may help put them back on track to being competitive again. It's still too early to start celebrating until we see benchmarks, but it's good news nonetheless.

Graphics

Submission + - Today's GPUs compared from the value angle (techreport.com)

J. Dzhugashvili writes: Reviews of new graphics cards are a dime a dozen, but you don't see many that factor price into the equation. That's just what The Tech Report did in its latest piece, which ranks today's latest and greatest graphics cards and multi-GPU configurations from $150 to $1500 based on how much performance they provide for your dollar. The results may surprise you: TR found that GeForce 9600 GT SLI dual-card configs offer singularly good value, even taking into account the usual caveats of multi-GPU setups. The results also show Nvidia beating rival AMD cards senseless from the value perspective, both in single- and multi-GPU tests.

Slashdot Top Deals

Software production is assumed to be a line function, but it is run like a staff function. -- Paul Licker

Working...