Comment Re:First amendment? (Score 1) 250
advertising dollars and the threat of their loss sure has a bite though.
advertising dollars and the threat of their loss sure has a bite though.
man did everyone here wake up with a hangover this morning?
didn't anyone notice that i was, you know, just trying to be funny AND apply some reasonable logic to this?
how much would you care to wager that in less then a year, the site will be looking exactly like it did before?
because without a doubt, many many people without your "special shoes" have trampled over that site over the past centuries.
what GP did was reprehensible...that is so obvious its beyond question.
my OP just poked fun at the official who claimed "OMG this has never happened before!"
good point about the Inca's not being around anymore...of course I meant their ancestors.
so this is the first organized group that has EVER walked around the site?? in its' entire history?
lol...i think my adoring
so then why haven't the Inca's totally blocked off the area and how did this large GP group get access to just be able to walk over over it?
for the life of me, i don't understand why the author of this post would feel the need to remain anonymous.
it is logical, thoughtful, and sensitive...have things gotten so bad here on
"There is no known technique to restore it the way it was."
not to be over simplistic or even the least bit forgiving against GP and this ridiculously stupid stunt, but perhaps they should look into a device called a "rake".'
it does wonders in sand traps for removing footprints...a different beast to be sure but come on..."no known technique"?
This will cost us billions of dollars in the private and public sector,
who is this "us" he is talking about? because with just a little thought, you quickly realized these "billions of dollars" are just transfers from the (assumed) wealthy building owners to the less wealthy contractors and workers.
one person's cost is another's paycheck and kids tuition payment.
if the public good is really being served here by improving safety of citizens, why isn't the discussion framed more along these lines?
its not down...
also, there is always the "google search 'stuff you want' thepiratebay, hit "Cached" and "Get this torrent" hack
just saying
...to fork his repository.
i think they are calling that delivery service "Amazon" these days.
...and when it blows up in their face, they should be allowed to sue to manufacturer too.
exactly my point...i was being sincere about how i understand the economics and politics of the situation.
...how more they could have got if they stayed at a Holiday Inn Express.
...but as long as it doesn't interfere with their job, why
should I care?
idk, maybe because HR tells you they have a blanket policy to automatically deny all convicted felons employment for legal reasons?
Lots of folks confuse bad management with destiny. -- Frank Hubbard