You obviously haven't worked with some of the developers I've worked with

See you've been modded up to 5 while remaining an Anonymous COWARD. Hey mods, "Insightful" doesn't mean the same as, "I agree with you! Right on!" (which there is no mod status for)

The arrested who can't bond out (either too expensive or no bond available) commonly site in jail for several months - 8 months isn't unheard of. Add to the fact that most attorneys will advise a waiver of speedy trial in order to prepare their client's case. (Who is in better shape in a speedy trial: a single attorney with a single assistance or the DA's office, with dozens of assistant DAs and paralegals?)

Does an illegitimate government have to keep writing checks?

There's several million welfare recipients who consider that government very legitimate. About 2 million inmates are also locked up by the states that rely on federal funds. Start taking away the poor's carrots and start releasing murderers and rapists, and I'm pretty sure that the rights of a computer cracker will be the least of your worries.

While there could be the same internals with new sandboxing, the lack of backwards compatibility for old apps along with new development models suggests to me a LOT of rewrite.

I was told I can could get Linux on a phone a couple of years ago. I assumed that meant it would be impervious to malware, that I'd have to edit text files using a text mode editor, that I'd have to spend hours tweaking the window manager just to get a GUI, and that I'd have to recompile the kernel to enable new features.

You just noticed that? A significant number of submissions (and on some days, a majority) do the exact same thing.

I remember when Slashdot submissions required some original thought, and the quality of your submission might determine if it was picked over others submitting the same link.

Much of the fault falls on Slashdot editors. It should take less than ten seconds to reject a submission based on a copy-and-paste summary. Of course, that'd harm their page views for ads, so gotta keep the stories coming no matter what, right?

That's why a laugh when I see any discussion about the evils of corporate greed. Impartial with regard to Google? Maybe if the big G wasn't a primary source of revenue. This isn't new however. About ten years ago, I made a hobby of grabbing screenshots of Slashdot where they were pimping Microsoft in banner ads - sometimes even on the same page as articles about MS. A couple are here:

http://web.archive.org/web/20020929185648/http://www.mr-bill.net/

Pretty sure this is more a lobby issue, and less a party issue.

I realize that on Slashdot, "GOP is derp, Democrats are magic unicorns" is the way we're supposed to think. However, from an ideological perspective, the GOP is more closely aligned with the ethos that could back copyright reform than the Democratic party: GOP cares about things like defense spending and big oil, and takes a "get off my lawn" attitude. Democratic party is backed by entertainment and software industries pretty heavy.

I'm not saying the Democratic platform is inferior or anything like that. Rather than check my brain at the door and say "Republicans are dumb" to throngs of derpalicious applause, I recognize that each party has very distinct ideologies. The Republican one is more closely aligned with what is necessary for copyright reform. I know it might sicken some Slashdotters to have to admit that they agree with (some parts of) the Republican party on something, but when ideology exists along a continuum (or probably better, thought of as a three dimensional matrix), its inevitable that a 2 party system will result in one or the other having conflicting values for any given person.

I'll be the first to admit, however, that the Republican party would be better served by a split. Right wing over there (Christian activists, opposed to social policy, shoot em up warmongers), those that are pro business and fiscal conservatives over here. I know the Libertarian party already meets the needs of the latter group, but I think party change needs to happen from within, as opposed to be recruited away. Of course, this is probably a pipe dream, as a fractured Republican party would have difficulty winning any elections without major election reform (do away with primaries, popular vote only, etc)

Eliminate all Chinese phones: where does Android stand then.

Here's my point: if iOS were easily pirated, 90% of China's smartphones would be iOS, not Android. China doesn't care about open source, "walled gardens" (think about the irony), or which corporation is evil. After all, what's more popular in China on the desktop: Windows or Linux? Windows is on every PC, only it's pirated. I promise that were it possible, it would be no different with iOS.

Indeed: I think the metric shouldn't be number of iPhones v. Androids, but rather, number of iPhones vs. Android phones with Google Play. A smartphone without a great app experience is more of a cleverphone, losing much of it's value proposition, both for the user and developers. That doesn't even get into the idea of whether Android users are less likely to spend money.

Let's say I'm going to spend the next 6 months build an app. Where do I put my energy? As the article says, most of the growth is in China. That's awesome for the Chinese people, awesome for the open source ecosystem, awesome for Google, and awesome for the handset manufacturers who are making those devices. For app producers, however, it's irrelevant if that marketshare doesn't reflect sales. Even if iOS becomes niche (which I think is likely), it seems to be the best place to put make investment.

I do think the development story is improving with Google Play and Amazon/BN's proprietary stores, but I believe that most devices making up the bulk of the Android market share are low end devices without those marketplaces. (Play is *not* part of the operating system) The more I think about it, I think iOS vs. Android matters less than Apple AppStore installs/instances vs. Google Play vs. (other app stores)

Too little innovation, too many apps like "Mobile photo sharing - FOR CATS!"

The funding game is dying, slowly. The future is in the 37 Signals and GitHubs of the world. (Both took funding I believe, but only after they were profitable : if the VC is how you keep the lights on, you're doing it wrong) Even more significant are the bootstrapped startups, the 1-4 person operations, that make great products that actually solve problems. (In other words, the anti-Instagram)

I'm a bit of a hack design wise, but doesn't "hero" suggest a large block, not "hero" as in the superhero sense? ("Hiding legal notices in a single img tag!")

I say that because a giant block with padding is classed "hero-unit" in Twitter Bootstrap.

Do you call it a Coke or a soda? Plus, for most of the personal computing age, the generic term PC or computer has typically referred to Windows/DOS machines. If someone is running a different OS, they've been taught to differentiate it for years. Most Linux users I know don't generically refer to their computer: they're quick to point out what they run.

Indeed. Let's say all the fandroid's wet dreams come true (not pointing out obvious pun there), and Apple throws in the towel. How good will the S4, S5, or S6 be? (Though to be fair, iPhone has languished over the past couple of generations)

In the long run, I believe Samsung wins. They are innovating; Apple is not, merely adding a bit of polish and shine here and there with incremental releases.

That said, this is poor journalism. They were comparing a new phone to Apple's 10? month old offering. It's not like people were buying 4S's and were blind-sided by the 5's release: no one in their right mind would buy a 4S when the same sized 5 would be available in a month or so. Not to mention, phones tend to have sales bursts when released, more so with the iPhone (it may be dumb for the fanbois to do it, but have you seen anyone camp out for days to buy a new Galaxy S*?) In other words, I'd say that by last quarter most people who wanted an iPhone 4S had one. You can mention upgrade cycles, but I know at least one carrier allows early upgrades when the iPhone is released if you're anywhere close to being eligible.

I think a fairer comparison would be to compare 1st month of sales of 4S v. S3, or to be more relevant, 5 v. S3. Anyone of the supposedly critical readers that make up Slashdot could see this article really doesn't say anything, even if it says what you want to hear. Sadly though, I believe the typical fanboi or fandroid on hear are so crazed, they're no different than a Belieber or those in the "Team Jacob v. Team Edward" arguments.

Again, I think Samsung is on the right trajectory. However, I think everyone so eager to crown Samsung king right now that they'll spin things in any way to pretend it's happened already.