Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Who? (Score 1) 306

You must not work in the corporate world. If you were not a confident idiot before joining, you will be after (or you'll be laid off). The guy who marches in the room with all the answers -> high value employee who knows his job and gets shit done. The guy who has more questions than answers? Incompetent idiot who ratholes meetings and deviates from the issue.

The irony is that usually the second guy is the more knowledgeable person, he knows enough to know he doesn't know shit. Unfortunately as in politics, the person with the snappy answer sets policy.

Hence why you need to be a lying sociopath to get ahead. You go into meetings with all of the confidence even though you know you are wrong or not entirely correct. Don't worry though, if anybody finds out, then you can always find a scapegoat.

Comment Re:I blame women (Score 1) 306

that sounds a bit confident. maybe it's too confident. maybe you are succumbing to Dunning-Kruger yourself!

I have found that if I sound confident, other people will listen and follow, regardless of whether I know what I am talking about. I have also found that women tend to be attracted to confident, self-assured men, and are less concerned about whether the guy is actually right or wrong. So, if my theory is correct, men should display more self-confidence. Maybe the author already considered gender differences, but I didn't RTFA, I am just assuming that I am right.

Taking what you say in a work context, I would agree. Whenever I go into a meeting, get asked a question, and respond with an accurate "it will most likely work", everybody freaks out and thinks I don't know what I'm doing. If I respond with "yeah, there's no way that can fail" while running through my head some edge cases that would cause it to fail, everybody leaves happy and congratulating themselves on a successful meeting. I eventually had it pointed out to me what I was doing, and now I see it clearly. For the most part, managers above mine have no clue what is going on, and only think it terms of "it will work" and "it won't work". They aren't going to go to the CIO and other senior directors and say "this is a good path, we are 92% certain it will work". In the end if I say it will work, and it really doesn't, then they have short memories anyways ... most of the time.

The most frustrating is when there's two options, one presented by somebody who has a history of not getting things right and generally doesn't know what he's doing, and one I present. The imbecile goes in with "this is the way to go, absolutely", and I go in with "this is the solution most likely to work. We'll know more after it runs for a few weeks and we have more history in this environment. They always go with the imbecile, and it always fails.

Comment Re:Standard Document Retention Policy (Score 1) 190

The goal of an effective document retention policy is to identify documents that can be destroyed and destroy them as soon as it is permissible to do so. Old documents are a court case with a broad discovery order away from becoming a big cost. It's very cheap to say "the retention policy says these documents are only kept five years and we physically destroy them shortly after this date".

I know of a county government in New York that kept their backups tapes from their mail server as a method of retention. There was some political trouble with a mayor (who used the county's email system) and a contractor - suspicion of giving no-bid contracts or something like that. A request came to the county's doorstep for all of the email correspondence between the two for the four years the mayor was in office. The county had to buy a spare server and restore each monthly tape to it and manually pick out the email messages. It cost them $190,000. It would have been better for them to either have an effective archiving plan, or to have deleted them. Keeping stuff "just in case" is a horrible idea.

Of course, if these documents are being singled out for aggressive purging and other documents are not, then there may be some funny business going on.

This happens every. When I worked at a county, we kept a couple ancient Novell servers around so that we could rebuild edirectory and groupwise and pull email out of it. The first request took a member on my team a solid month working a few hours of overtime every day to fulfill (that's wehre the ancient servers came from to begin with). After that, the requests were quicker, but still occupied somebody for about a week.

Comment Step up then... (Score 1) 190

presumably these are public records, because it's government and all. What's to stop anybody who is crying about "deletion of evidence" from submitting a FOIA request for all of the records that are set to be deleted, and then maintaining their own database?

Comment Re:So Paul Venezia doesn't like systemd, we get it (Score 1) 863

Yet another clueless anti-systemd rant by Paul Venezia, yawn.

So now he goes on an ad hominen and labels systemd proponents as clueless noobs, while serious admins hate it. Right. I, for one, in one of my duties as a professional system admin manage hundreds of Linux machines, can't wait until we finally get rid of that SysV init crap in favor of systemd (I won't rehash all the advantages systemd brings here). Due to EL7 switching, we'll eventually get there, thanks Redhat!

I run hundreds of linux machines and have no issue with SysV. Go ahead and rehash. How does SysV cause you headaches? I don't doubt it solves problems for people that work in the same space that I do, but I really haven't seen any so far that made me think "wow, that is insufferable and needs to change".

Comment Re:How about we hackers? (Score 1) 863

What are you talking about!?! my rc.httpd starts/stops apache, period... my rc.ntpd starts/stops ntpd, period... I could go on.

You are kidding right? The /etc/init.d/apache2 have 282 lines, which such nice loops like "# wait until really stopped if [ -n "${PID:-}" ]; then i=0 while kill -0 ${PID:-}" 2> /dev/null; do ..." that are obsolete in systemd, and hackery like "if $APACHE2CTL configtest > /dev/null 2> then # if the config is ok than we just stop normaly $APACHE2CTL stop 2>&1 | grep -v 'not running' >&2 || true else ..."

So, what does systemd look like instead to make sure you aren't trying to stop/restart apache with a bad config? ...and that "wait until apache is really stopped" loop is basically cosmetic so you can get a nice little "apache is stopped" message, so you're more than welcome to not put that in your init script.

Comment tempest in a teapot (Score 1) 221

Yeah, it could be more secure, but it also doesn't have to be. This article sounds like insurance companies just trying to get out of paying claims, which seems to be the primary business of insurance companies. It is computationally simple to crack keys and open a car door, but it is even more simple to break a window or just tow the car away.

Comment Re: IBM no longer a tech company? (Score 1) 283

Actually, as a former short time IBMer, I think you're both right. IBM core has lifers that have been sucked in and have worked there for years, most without skulls that ate actually marketable outside of IBM (yes, really). This self feeds where the vast majority internally still are riding on skills from 20yrs ago, and so the company competes over the past several years by bleeding out acquisitions it makes as it tries to buy its way into new markets without a real coherent strategy (see everything from storage platforms to their analytics acquisitions over past several years). Its a sales company where they try and compete on their long, slow, stodgy, established contracts, every once in awhile buying a new company and then rolling the capabilities under existing software contracts and agreements, adjusting the margin charge yearly to justify.

  This hasn't been working for several years at this point, anyone who understands basic financials can see the company has been playing financial games for about the last 4yrs (Money Mag gets credit for being one of the first mainstream places to call this out about a yr ago, even questuoning Buffets inVestment).

So yes, they are tech in the sense they invest quite a bit into r&d to establish a patent hold, if someone else comes up with a remotely competent product that sells, IBM goes through this portfolio to attain a royalty stake while divesting itself of the risk.

Does that sound like a tech company?

That sounds a lot like Novell in the early 2000s.

Comment Re:Missing option (Score 1) 258

I don't use a smart phone you insensitive clod.

And actually I don't .. I use an original RAZR .. which does all that I want a phone to do - make phone calls. And I only need to charge it twice a week.

I'm jealous. My original RAZR died years ago. Best phone I ever had though.

Slashdot Top Deals

Real Programmers don't eat quiche. They eat Twinkies and Szechwan food.

Working...