Comment government leaks usually mean (Score 1) 37
they are trickling down on you. so spray back!
thank you, thank you, don't forget to tip the waitresses, not the cows. I'll be here 5 to life.
they are trickling down on you. so spray back!
thank you, thank you, don't forget to tip the waitresses, not the cows. I'll be here 5 to life.
but the First Rule is harm no carbon-based life forms.
I'm going to lean back in my chair and look at my Facebook on the phone, instead. screw the choices.
unless you use it with hydrogen and a nuclear bomb, then it burns (fuses) real good. like this one I happen to have here....
afd0awre
a0as8ufaspd[q43wk
adi
\-- modem disconnected
at least we know nobody will be making a movie of this tragedy.
ha ha can't fool me, I didn't click.
oh, wait...
Having a system that supports the creation and nurturing of the next generation of mankind is in the long term best interests of homosexuals just as much as anyone else. Corrupting it into something purely based on decadent sex is not wise. For anyone.
Bullshit. You don't believe this, it's just an excuse to enable your prejudice. If you really believed it you'd be up in arms over opposite-sex married couples who don't have children and supporting same-sex couples who have children (adopted or other wise).
out of a trunk at a drive-in, or just inside a dark alley.
But they don't want to kill the people. They just want them to be too afraid to leave or to do anything that will get them fired.
Why the fuck would they bother with that?
Last I heard, those jobs were coveted and easy to fill with a long waiting list to get in.
In any case, you would need Amazon to actually enforce it. While they do have more money for legal fees, they would risk a big PR issue if they tried to prevent some guy from working at Walmart after quitting Amazon. Also, the first guy with such a problem wouldn't have a lot of trouble finding someone to help them with legal fees, if only for the publicity.
This is probably just a scare tactic, to discourage people from leaving them, it is unethical, but not really enforceable.
More likely, it's a case of megalomania of some middle manager somewhere. Some guy read the article about Facebook "stealing" methods for data centers and thinks the stuff "they invented" in the company is intellectual property worth billions and tries to "protect his ideas."
The non-competes I have experience with were always some big ego douchebag somewhere, not a real business need. It might be different in some industries, but random software consulting companies just don't need it. Yeah, you can be protective of client lists and such, but how to go about the job?
not to be confused with code that sorta looks like it, but surely doesn't smell like it...
knock them off the web for 12 hours, open it up... if they continue, block 'em again...
"We may change, suspend or discontinue the Service, or any part of it, at any time without notice."
Google has that problem too. And they have a long track record of abruptly killing services.
Say 210 watts system power at the wall. 5000 watts a day. Say $0.20/kWh. That is $1/day. No biggie? That's almost $400 a year. Per server. You claim how many? Funny how one under states power/CPU use but over states the rest. Who you lying for?
Amazon gives you infinite store for $60 a year.
That is why America rulez! and the Greeks druelz!
And if he pays for electric heat, some of that comes back in the form of not needing to heat as much. Even in summer time, sin ome places the basement is too cold to use as living space without heating it.
As usual, do the math and decide for yourself it it works for you.
Isn't it sort of obvious that hotel networks are a free-for-all security wise?
Use a VPN and SSL.
If all else fails, lower your standards.
