Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Oh, this sounds like a good idea... (Score 1) 209

First, it is way too easy to hide information from the PCI assessors. BTW, they are NOT auditors, they are assessors, there is a big difference. But it is too easy to hide stuff because to really dig into a complex system for every last detail is already cost prohibitive.

Which brings me to my second point. If liability gets pushed to the assessors (or SOX auditors which are real auditors) then the cost of being assessed/audited are going to skyrocket because they will just pass the cost of liability right back to the company that hired them. The companies being assessed/audited are being held at 'legal gunpoint' to comply and pay whatever cost. Then, the cost of being assessed will be passed on to the consumers or the company will go out of business.

Comment Re:Only as much as you need (Score 4, Insightful) 168

This is what PMI says to do, cherry pick what you need out of the vast standardized body of knowledge (PMBOK in PMI terms). However, if you don't have a good grip on the BOK, how do you know what to cherry pick and what to ignore? I'm not saying you need complete mastery of the PMBOK, but a course in the groundings of it helps immensely. I'm working on my SANS GIAC certification in PM and would be lost just picking up the PMBOK without the background of the class. The work project I'm doing right now is small and so some things like Budget Management and HR Management don't apply, but that might not be the case for the submitter.

Comment Re:I am a hippo, you insensitive clod! (Score 1) 599

When I started on Slashdot I would have been outraged at a lack of choice for number of Frags or Headshots or something more geek-oriented. Now I'm so old I can recite the Hippos Go Berserk without needing the book.

Comment Re:In other news (Score 3, Informative) 527

You are spot on and I would mod you up if I had points. I don't think the HDD manufacturers are behind this though. The simpler (and I think correct) reason is that older media used to be easier to recover data from. Newer hardware is different and the old methods do not apply. http://shsc.info/DataRecovery#titelanker5

Comment Thanks, but no thanks (Score 1) 715

I can do better for myself on my own, thank you. We already have too many people in IT who aren't skilled enough to be here. Thankfully the Dot-bombs of the early part of this century weeded out quite a few. When I start hearing stories about the woefully oppressed, underpaid, dis-enfranchised IT workers then I'll say we have a need. Considering most IT jobs are far easier than being a ditch-digger, we don't need a union bureaucracy to take care of us.
It's funny.  Laugh.

Purdue Students Win Rube Goldberg Contest 105

Dekortage writes "How long does it take to make a burger? Students from Purdue University's Society of Professional Engineers won the 2008 Rube Goldberg contest with a device that requires 156 steps to assemble a burger. According to the team captain, 'We put 4,000 to 5,000 man-hours into this machine since September, and all the hard work has been well worth it.' That's a long time to wait for dinner." Here's a video of the winning entry in operation.
Censorship

Submission + - Wikileaks to retaliate aganist Scientology (wikinews.org) 5

DragonFire1024 writes: "Wikinews.org — Wikinews has learned that The Church of Scientology has warned the documents leaking site Wikileaks.org that they are in violation of United States copyright laws after they published several documents related to the Church. Wikileaks has no intentions of complying, and states that in response, they intend to publish thousands of Scientology documents next week.
In the letter to Wikileaks, lawyers for the Church's Religious Technology Center (RTC), which oversees the use of the their logos, writings and religious content, states that the site "placed RTC's Advanced Technology works on Wikileaks.org's website without the authorization" of the Church.
"I have a good faith belief, and in fact know for certain, that posting copies of these works through your system was not authorized by my client, any agent of my client, or the law. Please be advised that your customer's action in this regard violates United States copyright law. Accordingly, we ask for your help in removing these works immediately from your service," states the letter from Ava Paquette of Moxon & Kobrin which was published by Wikileaks.
"Wikileaks will not comply with legally abusive requests from Scientology any more than Wikileaks has complied with similar demands from Swiss banks, Russian off-shore stem cell centers, former African Kleptocrats, or the Pentagon. Wikileaks will remain a place where people of the world may safely expose injustice and corruption," stated Wikileaks in a statement on their website.
Wikileaks further states that "in response to the attempted suppression, Wikileaks will release several thousand pages of Scientology material next week.""

Slashdot Top Deals

"Money is the root of all money." -- the moving finger

Working...