Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:BAD idea (Score 1) 206

There is a huge difference between creating something that will blow up your lab if you make a mistake and something that will live and grow outside of your control if you make a mistake. Also, with most Chemistry sets you can't get enough materials to do really dangerous stuff. Most of the bad chemicals are all under strict control or oversight. But the tools to make dangerous biologics don't have the same controls over them right now.

Comment BAD idea (Score 1) 206

Having worked as a research assistant in a mol bio lab, this scares the hell out of me. I don't want people creating the next super bug in their garage. Responsible research labs follow protocols about dealing with the bio-hazardous waste they generate. What happens when your neighbor releases his new organism by accident? And do we really need 'home brew' for this? If you want to study this stuff, go to school for it!

Submission + - Nanoparticles blast their way into cancer cells (fiercedrugdelivery.com)

hlovy writes: Nanoparticles are moving in like Star Wars storm troopers, lasers blasting, to punch holes in cells and force them to take in anti-cancer therapeutic agents. No, it's not the latest summer action thriller in your local megaplex. It's research that will be reported in the August issue of the journal Nature Nanotechnology.

Submission + - Nuclear energy now more expensive than solar (nytimes.com)

js_sebastian writes: According to an article on the New York Times, a historical cross-over has occurred because of the declining costs of solar vs the increasing costs of nuclear energy: solar (hardly the cheapest of renewable technologies, is now cheaper than nuclear, at around 16 cents per kilowatt hour. Furthermore, the NY Times reports that financial markets will not finance the construction of nuclear power plants unless the risk of default (which is historically as high as 50 percent for the nuclear industry) is externalized to someone else through federal loan guarantees or ratepayer funding. The bottom line seems to be that nuclear is simply not competitive, and the push from the US government to subsidize it seems to be forcing the wrong choice on the market.

Comment Re:Oh, this sounds like a good idea... (Score 1) 209

First, it is way too easy to hide information from the PCI assessors. BTW, they are NOT auditors, they are assessors, there is a big difference. But it is too easy to hide stuff because to really dig into a complex system for every last detail is already cost prohibitive.

Which brings me to my second point. If liability gets pushed to the assessors (or SOX auditors which are real auditors) then the cost of being assessed/audited are going to skyrocket because they will just pass the cost of liability right back to the company that hired them. The companies being assessed/audited are being held at 'legal gunpoint' to comply and pay whatever cost. Then, the cost of being assessed will be passed on to the consumers or the company will go out of business.

Slashdot Top Deals

1 + 1 = 3, for large values of 1.

Working...