Comment Re:Interesting tidbits (Score 1) 87
Actually I think their claimed 'prototypical inventor' was just involved in patent litigation, not specifically involved in litigation with intellectual ventures.
Actually I think their claimed 'prototypical inventor' was just involved in patent litigation, not specifically involved in litigation with intellectual ventures.
There is nothing natural about interacting with flying robots...
In soviet linux the keyboard is the mouse:
...of the asteroids that we know about...
If you do anything to correct the situation, you are reinforcing the bad behavior, and it will continue to happen with greater frequency.
You actually get punished more for trying to do the right thing.
You should just delete them, mark as spam, etc.
From a behavior stand point you would want to avoid reinforcing the behavior, and possibly also identify a way to punish the behavior -- one could do the wrong thing and publish them online, which might be a punishment (while probably technically legal, this behavior could increase the frequency with which you interact with lawyers).
In my case, someone has the same name modulo middle name, and his gmail is one character more than mine, so I get a few of their emails a month, at first I tried to respond to the sender, or forward them along, but it just kept happening so I now I delete them or mark them as spam.
A patent dies everytime you mentaly masterbate on slashdot. Oh the horror.
I think most if not all hospitals have this tech.
The station(s) go offline, and service personel come and fix it... parts of the network going offline is not an unusual event. Unlike the 19th century tech, these packet (plastic canister) routed pneumatic tube systems lack humans at the core of packet routing.
From a volunteer's point of view at a non-Stanford hospital, the IT integration was less than stellar. Maybe Stanford has done some work in that area, or maybe this is just astroturfing by a pneumatic tube company.
A few accounting entries is all it takes to fix this problem, literally
erasing the bogus value much to the dismay of a few but not the many. An entirely new system is required to eliminate
the core flaws and a global currency will not work properly for the common
economic system participant because of the disparity between the economies of
various countries. What has been suggested is localized regional value exchange
systems that would interface with other regional systems in a totally
transparent and "natural" market manner.
I will leave you with this thought, if you went to a bank and asked to borrow
money to go to the casino what do you think they would tell you? The banks did
not need to ask anyone. They should have asked the US citizens because they are the ones backing the banks with a portion of their future labor potential. Sure the odds would usually be better than a casino, but
in review of some of the financial instruments the actual odds were worse than
the casino.
Only through hard work and perseverance can one truly suffer.