Disconnect from the emotion of this issue and try to think logically and I will too.
If vaccines allegedly protect children from viruses by infecting them,
And a child A has been vaccinated,
how can child B who has not been vaccinated be a threat to a protected child?
And is not Child A a threat to child B because Child A is carrying a live virus?
Do they not report that sometimes innoculations will actually cause the very outcome which they are designed to protect against?
Do you really have a good basis to trust your government?
How do you know that what they are putting inside you isn't intended to make you more controllable?
I would defend myself against innoculations as strongly as if someone were coming at me with a knife.
That's just how I think of it.
We've been conditioned to be very emotional about this issue. I hope we can someday lay aside the emotion and rationally discuss this.