Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:the Putin stage (Score 1) 294

Never said anything to the contrary. Democrat or Republican, the comment about rich oligarchy has a fair amount of truth in the US.

For example, the Bay Area has a Congressional race between old tech money Mike Honda and new tech money Ro Khanna. Both Democrats.

Due to recent election reforms it's actually an interesting race. The primary is non-partisan, so the top 2 vote getters go to the general election. Of course, interesting doesn't necessarily mean better. People with money will always find ways to use that money to fuck up good intentions (in this case Honda's PAC is actually supporting the Republican candidate to try to keep Khanna from coming in second. Despicable, IMO. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...

Comment Re:Credit rating databases aren't new (Score 1) 294

Exactly. The courts got involved, and saved the girl's life

The courts didn't save any life, and in fact, they didn't even get involved. Cigna eventually reversed their decision, but the girl died before the transplant could be performed, anyway. Amazing how an entire debate can go on here without anyone knowing the actual facts of the example.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D...

Comment Re:the Putin stage (Score 1) 294

If you ARE, you pretty much dont have a reason to complain about the voting in this country.

Except with the current 2 party system, primaries are useless to the minority party in many districts. Not to mention national-level elections are more determined by the amount of money spent than actual positions, which was his point. If the Koch brothers want to spend millions on a candidate, they usually win. There's plenty of reason to complain...

Comment Re:the Putin stage (Score 4, Insightful) 294

Exactly, this is idiotic. You submit MUCH more financial information than this to the government every year.

Honestly credit ratings are one area that the government may be the *right* organization to control. The current credit agencies are for-profit businesses that have very little interest in keeping your information accurate (or investigating shady companies who try to use your credit rating as extortion) and you have very little recourse to fix their mistakes.

Comment Re:Where's The Content? (Score 1) 207

No, THAT'S really not true. We have done A/B testing in the office and not only does it not make much of a difference from distances beyond where your eyes can resolve it, 1080p content sometimes looks WORSE on 4k displays due to scaling (similarly to how SD content looks worse on HD TVs than on SD TVs).

What really DOES make a difference at average home sizes and distances is HDR displays (higher bit depth). The high dynamic range is striking compared to the fairly crappy dynamic range of standard YUV 4:2:0 content.

Comment Re:Where's The Content? (Score 1) 207

Yep. Because it's trivial to make 4k displays these days (a friend working with the CE manufacturers said it's now down to about $50 extra for a 50" 4k vs 1080p display). But creating and distributing 4k content is a completely different story (will require H.265 encoder that no one supports yet, and even with that take 2x the bitrate).

In any case, from what I have heard HDR (increased bit depth for higher dynamic range) content will have a MUCH bigger impact on perceived video quality than 4k. 1080p HDR takes fewer bits than 4k, and for 90% of the home market the size and distance setup for TVs means no one can even make out the extra resolution anyway. Problem is HDR is a much bigger hardware change for displays than 4k LCD panels...

Comment Re:False comparison (Score 1) 339

Unfortunately, you only own the physical disc, not the content on it (which you just licensed). If you lose it, no one has a record that you licensed the content.

That's the nice thing about UltraViolet, for example - you can buy the DVD or BD and add the rights to the UV locker so you can have the physical copy, and stream (or possibly even download it) from any service that supports it.

Comment Re:I wonder (Score 1) 190

No, the B-52 is called the "Stratofortress" for a reason. It's not supersonic like the B-1 or stealth like the B2, it was basically a replacement for the B-29 with jet engines.

It was designed back when 500 mph (440 kn, not 500) and 50,000 feet was enough to effectively avoid most antiaircraft fire.

Slashdot Top Deals

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...