Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Both Ways (Score 1) 511

But would you vote for an ignorant Republican and throw the people to the wolves?

Well, no...I'd not vote an 'ignorant' Republican...but from what I've seen, I don't think Romney has shown himself to be an ignorant person.

At the very least, he seems to have much more on the ball than, say...Joe Biden, who can't seem to keep his foot out of his mouth...and is only one heart attack away from the presidency.

Obama is a center-right president, which of course upsets both the left and the extreme-insane-fallen-off-the-map-right. There's a real danger that we could wind up with wingnut throwbacks in charge just because modern people aren't quite satisfied with Obama.

I have to heartily disagree with you in my view of Obama. Perhaps you are describing him from a European point of view, not the US view on liberal vs conservative.

I think Obama is one of the most left leaning, divisive and ideological people I've ever seen in power in the US, much less in the presidency. I think he is so very stuck to his ideals based agenda, that he cannot truly compromise or even see when things he tries and supports just do not work. I think he is so bent on going with fundamentally changing the US, its principals...etc...that he wants to keep pushing it even to the detriment of our country and its people.

Really? Really?

Let's look at some of his more signature accomplishments:

  • Health care legislation: based on ideas from a Republican Governor and the Heritage Foundation (although both of those had public option aspects).
  • ARRA: half tax cuts
  • Immigration: has set records for deporting illegal immigrants
  • WoT: continued and expanded Bush policies for internet-warfare, targeted killings, warrantless surveillance and indefinite detention
  • Gun bans: nothing proposed, enacted or even discussed
  • About the only thing he has been to the left on is gay rights, and even that was basically half-hearted until very recently.

Comment Re:Both Ways (Score 5, Insightful) 511

Every single survey, poll, etc that was on the news at the time had between 96 and 98% of american black voters voting for him. That means they ignored all policy, all politics, all financial plans, all qualifications, all personal history, all things in general he said he'd do, and just for him based on the color of his skin.

What you mean is "96 and 98% of american black voters" voted for the Democrat - the 96% Obama got is consistent with the 90% that Gore got, the 88% Kerry got, the 90% Mondale and Dukakis got, the 94% Johnson got etc.

If blacks were voting overwhelmingly based on race, than you should see overwhelming support for Hermain Cain, Alan Keyes, Ward Connerly, etc. That's not the case.

Comment Re:To stop being sexist, stop being sexist (Score 1) 697

What the governments shouldn't do is announce specific groups of people protected, and enact quotas and other ways to promote those groups ahead of other groups, on the basis that they have been historically discriminated against, and now need an unfair advantage in order to "even out" things. That is segregation and discrimination, and it is no less evil when it's done in favor of the minority rather than the majority. That is what affirmative action is.

Uh, no it isn't. Quotas (in the USA) in particular have been illegal since the 1970's.

Comment Re:a nice whopper of an evil by Google (Score 2) 402

Since incorporation means that you obligate yourself to the pursuit of profit over all else, it is not much of a stretch to say it also effectively obligates you to evil.

Uh, no. Maybe you can argue that an IPO or accepting outside investment obligates yourself to the pursuit of profit over all else, but not incorporation in and of itself. If my LLC cared about profit over all else, I'd be charging a lot more for my services.

Comment Re:Your "tool" is broken (Score 5, Informative) 897

BULLSHIT The segregationist racist laws of the US South were passed by DEMOCRATS

Yes- conservative Democrats. Liberal = Democrat and Conservative = Republican is a recent turn of events, before the 1960's there were conservative and liberal Republicans, as well as conservative and liberal Democrats.

Comment Re:Oh goodie. (Score 2) 176

iTunes may be a household name, but the award states "career in music" and "significant contributions, other than performance, to the field of recording." Steve Jobs fails on both of those requirements. He may deserve an award of some technical nature for the field of access to purchase music, but iTunes does not merit a Grammy for Steve.

It's not "career in music," it's "during their careers in music" which changes the context some. In any event, looking at the effect Jobs had on the music industry, I'd say he was at least as deserving of the award as Dick Clark, Don Cornelius, and Walt Disney (previous recipients).

Comment Re:High Speed rail (Score 1) 709

Moron. You increase the number of people on each airplane. Bigger airplanes.

Ain't that simple. "Bigger airplanes" assumes that the longer runways that can accommodate those larger planes aren't already maxed out. In the event that there is room to accommodate those planes, the airport has to account for new wake separation procedures. There's also the issue of whether the markets served by the airline are appropriate for larger planes. Finally, larger planes are in many (but not all) cases louder than smaller planes, and that results in environmental issues that are similar to those building new runways.

At best, "Bigger airplanes" is a stop-gap solution.

Comment Re:High Speed rail (Score 2) 709

Bay Area and LA-area airports are at or near capacity, and will be bursting at the seams in the next 15-20 years. Expanding capacity by adding new runways or building new airports will cost tens of billions of dollars (DIA cost $3 billion, and that was for building an airport in the middle of nowhere almost 20 years ago that handles less traffic than LAX does). Furthermore, air travel can be affected by weather (fog, thunderstorms, in CA's case) that doesn't affect rail

Transportation options are important, there is no single perfect mode.

Comment Re:Yeah, I do. (Score 1) 645

And what does a gathering place for nerds and geeks have to do with the statement "a cultural difference where American black culture has a much lower opinion on average of nerdy endeavors as opposed to American white culture"? Especially when blacks also attend Comic-con as well as gatherings targeted toward blacks.

Comment Re:No. (Score 1) 645

Yeah, I didn't really think I had to spell the whole thing out. Nerd = person involved in study/non sporty/uncool activities. Person who is not involved in the world of higher education/going to school/giving a shit about school != nerd culture.

Yeah I got that, but what does that (and you're links) have to do with the assertion of "black culture" being "generally anti nerd"? Low achievement does not automatically mean 'not giving a shit about school.'

I might check it out, but I'm not saying there's a cultural difference [,,]

Than why bother singling out "black culture"?

I'm not comparing black with white, but 2 parents vs 1 parent, hence the similarity with white kids in the same situation. In the UK there are more black kids in that situation.

Sure, but that's an economic problem, not a racial problem, it just happens to fall on racial lines. Attributing differences to "black culture" being "anti nerd" is an unsupported assertion.

Slashdot Top Deals

Love may laugh at locksmiths, but he has a profound respect for money bags. -- Sidney Paternoster, "The Folly of the Wise"

Working...