Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Submission + - Ask Slashdot: Can commercial hardware routers be trusted? 1

monkaru writes: Given reports that various vendors and encrytion algorithms have been compromised. Is it still possible to trust ANY commercial hardware routers or is "roll your own" the only reasonable path going forward?

Submission + - Ask Slashdot: UI Toolkit Recommendations?

tippen writes: What would you use to build the management GUI for a new network appliance? Assume it is for a startup, so no existing frameworks or code to worry about. No employees yet, so options are wide-open from a skills perspective. OS on the management processor (x86) will be either Linux or one of the BSDs.

Lots of options out there, but which ones would you recommend we consider for a modern management GUI? More importantly, why is that the right choice?

Comment Re:My rule for SSD (Score 1) 183

SSD solutions that are far too expensive to be relevant for most individuals or even corporations are nothing new.

You can get an mSATA or M2 small ~32-64GB SSD drive (which many motherboards have direct attach slots for now) for about $60. If you use that as your boot / OS system / critical-app drive and get a slow multi-TB spindle HDD drive for your bulk load-and-save storage you'll get huge improvement in your startup/shutdown times and general system operation while still having cheap mass media. Is that far too expensive?

Comment Another predictable ./ perspective... (Score 1) 183

As Dr FrankNfurter says in RHPS "I didn't build him for YOU!!!" It's amusing whenever new datacenter/server technology gets posted on /. that half the posts evaluate the proposed product in terms of how affordable/practical/useful it would be to them in their little client desktop or notebook. All of these Intel drives are intended for server (or at least technical workstation ) use, so they need to be evaluated by ROI they give a business doing high-throughput work. If you think they have great stats but are too expensive, maybe you are not the intended market.

Comment Re:Any technical prowess better spent on Fukushima (Score 1) 51

The hemispheric disaster has not happened yet. But until they finish unloading reactor 4 - which won't be until end of 2014, any serious earthquake (a high probability in that area) could cause the precarious elevated rod bundles to crash down and even the best case scenarios, if that happens, are ugly.
How bad things are after that is still up for debate, but reactor 4 is a clear and present danger.

Comment The really interesting question is... (Score 1) 193

... when some foreign visitor sends a strongly encrypted message they the Russian authorities find difficult or impossible to decrypt. If this were a typical Russian citizen, this would probably merit a visit from some representative of the authorities who will persuade you that the encryption is a bad idea based on bad consequences if you don't. In the case of the international attendees, one assumes the Russians will not able to do this quite so casually. But they will probably be pretty obsessed with those visitors...

Comment The tyranny of ARM (& practically everything e (Score 1) 251

Slashdot technorati will dump all over this, but the only truly open ecosystem in user-purchasable computing available today is x86 from Intel and AMD. All others esp ARM based platforms (except for -albeit interesting- toys like Raspberry Pi) are vertically integrated closed systems that you have to explicitly defeat the original vendors efforts to keep them closed to use in non-approved ways and in many cases (eg Apple IOS devices) are virtually impossible to reload a different OS on.
This is deliberate and the anomaly of x86 is a result of a series of happy accidents and mistakes several vendors incl IBM made in created a monster they never wanted but have had to live with because it became such an unslayable monster. Let's hope it lives on so that in 2020 we're not all using closed hardware/software bricks that are totally at the mercy of vendors. (We'll just have to join hobbyist cliques of people who like to work on "vintage computers" from the early part of the century...)

Submission + - Ask Slashdot: Scientific Research Positions for Programmers?

An anonymous reader writes: I recently (within the past couple years) graduated from college with a bachelor's degree in Computer Science and currently work as a programmer for a large software consulting firm. However, I've become gradually disillusioned with the financial-obsession of the business world and would like to work for the overall betterment of humanity instead. With that in mind, I'm looking to shift my career more toward the scientific research side of things. My interest in computer science always stemmed more from a desire to use it toward a fascinating end — such as modeling or analyzing scientific data — than from a love of business or programming itself. My background is mostly Java, with some experience in C++ and a little C. I have worked extensively with software analyzing big data for clients. My sole research experience comes from developing data analysis software for a geologic research project for a group of grad students; I was a volunteer but have co-authorship on their paper, which is pending publication.

Is it realistic to be looking for a position as a programmer at a research institution with my current skills and experiences? Do such jobs even exist for non-graduate students? I'm willing to go to grad school (probably for geology) if necessary. Grad school aside, what specific technologies should I learn in order to gain an edge? Although if I went back to school I'd focus on geology, I'm otherwise open to working as a programmer for any researchers in the natural sciences who will take me.

Comment Some Intel OEMs do better than others (Score 1) 1

Apple is simply one of the higher margin, higher innovation PC OEMs Intel has. (Yes Virginia, Apple makes personal computers that run Mac OS, WIndows, and various *ixes while other OEMs make personal computers that run all those except Mac OS (legally that this - Hackintoshes violate OSX licence).)
Apple's margins are higher than other PC OEMs because they add more value which users perceive to be worth higher ASPs (average selling price).
There's nothing about Intel's sales model which forces OEMs to have low margins.

Slashdot Top Deals

"May your future be limited only by your dreams." -- Christa McAuliffe

Working...