Here's a different one she may have broken, http://www.foxnews.com/politic...

Apparently, after leaving the the department you sign this form (http://www.gsa.gov/portal/forms/download/115326)

If she signed that she lied and therefore essentially lied under oath.

Wow really? Everyone attacking her is being a hypocrite? The argument is stupid, deal with it. If it was wrong when Bush did it, it's wrong now. And the people using arguments like cahuenga's are being the real hypocrites.

Are you touched in the head? Seriously? Bush did it, so let's not worry. Wrong is wrong, Bush got away with it, fine. Let's not let another person get away with. Particularly, the person who called the Bush administration corrupt and full of cronyism over their email scandal (she did this in 2007 btw).

Except in 2007 Hillary in a speech denounced the "secretive" Bush administration practices, calling it cronyism and corruption. She then has the gall to do this. Really?

About half the country has open primaries I think.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O...

Not really.

Well that can't be true, I clearly see the dress as black/blue but saw B....OMG...I'm some sort of freak of nature!!!

I'm not trying to defend Hillary here, but for honesty's sake, I clicked the link you gave and saw a B. I hit clear cache and it retested as B. :/

Citation: http://www.foia.gov/how-to.htm...

From FOIA.gov:

Since the private email server is not part of the agency record, a FOIA request can not be made on it. I don't give a shit if you're an AC pretending to be some non-civilian. You apparently don't have a clue. FOIA requests are for public records, not private records. Her email server is a private record, so to get at it, you must have subpoena. The only hope you have with a FOIA record in this instance is that she didn't leave out any important emails. But good luck at getting anyone to willingly give up for record keeping incriminating emails.

We also have a President who lied (again depending on who you believe) and said he found out about it from the news.

Just so we're all clear:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U...

Just for context here. Clinton called himself the Black Sheep of the Bush family. And W. Bush called Hillary his step-sister when asked to talk about the possibility of Jeb facing Hillary.

Which theoretically would be the official State Department email servers. Anyway around it, the official email servers were more secure than Hillary's.

Of the four Sec. of States that were around for email usage in the White House (Clinton and earlier). Two did not use email, Albright and Rice. The only other Secretary of State that used email was Colin Powell. He's admitted that he used a personal account for at least some of his official business. His emails are lost he says. Remember though, he was Sec. of State between 2001 and 2005. The means all of his emails are at least 10 years old by now.

More importantly, what previous holders of the office did does not matter here. Why? For at least a couple reasons. First, the push in recent years is for transparency. If previous holders did actions that are considered bad under the need for transparency and record keeping then continuing what they're doing is not right. Arguing that the previous guy did it and saying that absolves you of responsibility is wrong. Second, And pay attention here, Clinton in '07 in a speech railed against "secret emails" of the Bush administration, calling it cronyism and corruption; and then saying more transparency is needed. It's incredibly hypocritical to talk about that and then do what Clinton did.