The best democracy in the world, the land of the free and child murderers is also waging similar shitty laws, with better effects and for decade.

> What will it take to tear down Big Brother? Only solution is to end global state-wide centralized tyrranic governments.
Including tyrrany of majority - the [state-wide, both direct and by choosen war criminal] democracy.

Why do you want to "ID growers", must you be a little Hitler and poke nose in what other people do in own home?

Commie, please.
The corporations exploit you because they can write bad law and ban/regulate many things. This is fault of democracy.
Without democratic process, with local small governments, this is not an issue.
As for wealth distribution, it distributes in the fair way: if people want to pay 100 more for what person B does, then he will be earning 100 more. Deal with it, don't be a greedy jellous gnome. Why don't you do what B does?
If you are forbidden to do what B does, then it's fault of democracy: e.g. state monopoly on making drugs, or medicine, patents.

LOL! :D
Also look at "our leadership" = out of 8, 7 are male :&

The articles I seen on slashdot were more about how "most CEOs are white / male / normal / etc" and "OMG income gap" to be exact.

If Negros are rare as CEOs of successive companies then this is because either
1) they statistically are less often good at it
2) or, there is some law making it unfiarly hard for them to do it
If 2 then remove this law (but there isn't), if 1 then it's fair.

In addition if 1 is result of bad eduction then again
1) if it's that the Black people prefer e.g. sports, then it's their will, let them do what they want 2) if there is some law e.g. making it illegal to teach Black people.. but there is none

basically all this problems are solved by de-regulation. Or if we will come down to "this is because most blacks are poor - and this is OUR fault because we enslaved them" then very good, pay them proper (one time!) reperations and from then it's in their corner.

I wonder if someone would actually solved social problems in fair way as above, instead of milking SJW drama in the lewrong way.

Would this article show up when talking about:
"Male-Run companies often do better than Female-run ones" ?
Would it? On Slashdot the news for SJWs - apparently.

Btw such article would be correct (this statement is correct).
Same goes for...
Streight-run companies often do better than homosexual-run ones.
Homosexuals-run companies often do better than streight-run ones.
White-run companies often do better then Blakcs-run ones.
Blacks-run companies often do better then normale ones.
etc.
Does anyone thing ONLY male CEO can ever bring a success?
Of course not. What are you fighting with Slashdot?

Yeap it should scare off criminals. Like a guy who downloaded an mp3 from Internet.

That action would made more sense if law that police executes would not be mostly bullshit.

SJW posts on Slashdot.org are getting ridiculous, why it is some tragedy that both genders choose other things to do in their life?

And that justification is bullshit.

No, if you will punish people, they will self-censor because your thread of violence.

Lol >_>

But we already had found that!
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn.

Not limited to that, as we said, it went up 10000% or
2000% or in last 2 years, or indeed 30% (drop) in last year.
So it can give profit - it is useful as (risky) investmen.
Due to inflation and the basics and at historu I would say that it can drop x10 but also can grow x100, so I would add it is one of more interesting investition devices - on top of being ok for payments as we agreed.