That dead horse has had about enough, that's why. Try googling it, as there's plenty of speculation out there. But in light of the fact that the TC devs have been silent, speculation is all you're going to get.

Oh! In that case, where do I sign up?

There is no way I'll be paying anyone $130 for a qwerty keyboard.

The advertisement flyer is not a source, and due to its very nature neither is Wikipedia.

There may have been a gulf between their knowledge prior to the discovery of fission and modern understanding, but almost immediately following that discovery we had working reactors and functional weapons. Certainly fusion devices were and are a different beast, but it comes down to less about any "secrets" and much more about money. The physics is the "easy" part, but even Oppenheimer and Teller wouldn't have been able to engage in much more than esoteric navel gazing if it weren't for a LOT of money.

This is about thermonuclear weapons, not fission ones.

Have you ever read a single thing about World War II? Seen a History Channel show about it? Anything? I'd recommend it. It's fascinating, and you are in serious need of the education.

Or beaten senseless against the passengers who are strapped into their seats. Think, man.

Awfully high in relation to what? Zero?

So pointing out a logical flaw is considered "trolling"? +1 for Interesting!

So an innocent citizen's life is so precious that...it's okay to kill some of them in order to punish others who take innocent life? Gotcha.

Hence the quotes. I'm not going to jump into a semantic debate, however. Most folks here seem to have gotten the gist.

The lie is impressively effective, but it's still a lie. This has less to do with the "lie" told to subject by the researchers, and much more to do with the "lie" the subject tells himself.
It's still just sugar.

The placebo itself is not effective - it's the "lie" that is effective.

Way to put up a strawman to deflect from the fact that you just got served.