Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:About time. (Score 2) 309

you can't put nuclear close to a fault line, in a place where there's tornadoes or hurricanes, and you generally need to put it next to a river for cooling though you can also use giant cooling towers. And of course, you can't put it anywhere near a metro area.

Apparently you can...

They built San Onefre right near a fault line...
They built Wolf Creek right in tornado alley (ironically this was NOT one of the multiple plants that have been actually hit by tornados)...
12 east coast nuclear reactors were in the path of Hurricane Sandy...
They built Indian Point near New York City...
They built Palo Verde not near any natural body of water (they use treated sewage water from nearby Phoenix suburbs for cooling)
etc, etc, etc...

I'm not saying any of this was/is a good idea, but just that the mere existence of real nuclear power plant in these locations has trumped your statement.

Comment Re:About time. (Score 1) 309

Nuclear reactors don't need water. You can build liquid metal cooled reactors. Metallic sodium is one such metal used.

Although some reactors have been built with liquid metal cooling, nearly all have been experimental reactors only. However, even in liquid metal cooled reactors, generally the turbine that actually generates the electricity is driven using a steam cycle (which uses water). So technically a nuclear reactor doesn't need water, but generally you want electricity out such a reactor (unless you are using it simply to generate transuranic elements)...

Comment Re:Hmmm... (Score 4, Interesting) 212

Correct me if I'm wrong, but does this mean that the neutrons literally flow across a fourth dimensional axis, and then somehow bounce back after they've moved some distance on one of the other axes, landing in the trap while within our plane of the fourth dimension?

Not exactly, the quirk they are testing is effectively the neutron travelling through both "branes" in a superposition state (well, it's actually a bit more subtle than that, but that's the easiest way to explain it).

If so, how are they supposed to spot the neutrons the moment they cross into our brane but before they move into another one?

They aren't tracking specific neutrons, they are making a statistical assumption about a collection of neutrons.

More specifically, by running the experiment multiple times with the neutron source a different distance away from their shielded measurement chamber and at different times of year (to account for different magnetic vector contribution from the sun), they can potentially statistically isolate neutrons detection events that are expected to spontaneously appear (e.g., as a result of cosmic rays originating outside of experimental parameters) from those neutrons that supposedly move in and out of our "brane" as a result of superposition which are sourced locally (whose flux depends on the distance from the source).

We'll see how it goes. They haven't done the experiment yet...

Comment Re:Lasers are easy to stop (Score 1) 517

If your going to shoot the railgun the same way you shoot conventional guns what's the point?

The main point of a railgun is that you don't have to launch the payload with gunpowder, but with electricity. There are more safe and battle-field redundant means for electrical generation than the existing storage and transit requirements for gun-powder.

Even if they had the same mussel velocity.

Comment Re:More awkward learning social nicety in a pit (Score 1) 700

There are a lot of people who behave like they are still in high-school...

Since evidence suggests that "cliques" and "bullying" continues through university and into business** being exposed to it and learning to deal with it is likely an important life skill to be learned (similar to EQ, and perhaps arguably more important than academics). I'm not saying home schoolers (of which I know a few) can't learn these skills, but depending on your career aspirations, growing up in "tougher" environments can often be a formative learning experience for young folks.

They are more professional, less crass and boorish.

You say that like it's good to be professional all the time and bad to ever be crass and boorish. I guess to each his own, but personally, I would find a such a permanent professional veneer existence rather sterile and boring (even in the office)...

They don't attract notice except in passing to note someone seems strangely confident in themselves.

FWIW, confidence is a two edged sword. The risk with confidence, is over-confidence, and not knowing yourself. This in itself can benign in the form a comparative-optimism which can contribute to delusion that they are more likely (than average) to have good things happen to them and less likely (than average) to have bad things happen to them which often leads to a happier life. Or in the other extreme a Dunning-Kruger handicap throughout life. More confidence is not always better, but more self awareness generally doesn't hurt (too much, although can be depressing at times).

Sometimes it's hard to find out who you are and develop self-awareness when constantly in an environment created by your parents. I've seen that happen many times in my university (with both home schooled and highly sheltered children), since they weren't exposed to a more free-wheeling environment before, they we just discovering who they were when the consequences were much higher (if you want an analogy, not unlike getting the chicken pox early in life vs when you are an adult, or learning to drive for the first time on your playstation vs with a 1/2 ton steel box with seatbelts and airbags).

There is also some evidence that artificial confidence can be crippling for some children (e.g., forced to show artificial confidence, but knowing they are untested, some children are extra fragile when confronted with failure and develop coping strategies than can be self-defeating or even anti-social).

**They range from the more benign "lunch-invite-crowd", cafeteria table, smoke-break crew, to the more malignant country club good-old-boy variety and everything in between. Some folks just call this office politics to make it somehow sound more mature, but it's really just the same thing...

Comment Re:Going to University (Score 1) 700

Math education at most colleges don't have a single class in common with math majors.

Ouch, that's depressing.

One of my good friends is a junior high math teacher, and although this is somewhat true, it is a bit misleading.

One thing that I have found is that for a subject say like algebra or elementary set theory, there is a level of understanding you need to pass a class and another level of understanding to teach it to someone else that has a lower level of understanding than you do. Taking linear algebra and group theory classes letting algebra rust isn't then same as learning basic algebra and geometry more in depth augmented with a survey of linear algebra, statistics and leaving the group theory on the table.

As a personal anecdote, when I was in high school, I was pretty advanced in math so my math teach made me "help" teach math to some of the other students in the class. At the time, I somewhat resented this imposition, but when I got to university (and did some tutoring and TA work), I found that these exercises helped me learn this basic material much better than I would have just to get an 'A+' in the class (and forced me to develop more than one strategy to get people to understand these topics).

Comment Re:Where Apple failed, (Score 1) 98

Of course on the orange hand, Kyocera has low volume phones and their ceramics group makes their own sapphire, where Apple currently needs to contract to get access to sapphire manufacturing.

I suspect that won't change in the near future, but perhaps, eventually, Apple will attempt to get their sapphire coated glass idea manufactured at some point. I'm guessing that although they would undoubtedly like exclusivity, I don't think that will be in the cards following that whole GTAT fiasco, so they might have to suck it up and invest in their own production if they insist on that...

Space

Astronomers Find Vast Ring System Eclipsing a Distant Star 85

Zothecula writes: Astronomers from the Leiden Observatory, Netherlands, and the University of Rochester, New York, have discovered a massive ring system obscuring the light of the young star J1407b. It is believed that the rings belong to a massive planet or possibly a brown dwarf, with an orbital period of roughly 10 years. The giant planet boasts a ring system around 200 times larger than that of Saturn, the only planet in our solar system hosting a ring system of its own."

Comment Re:Brightness (Score 2) 67

They calculated that there are 5 planets orbiting the star by the way the intensity of the star dips very, very slightly in a pattern. Are we sure there are no other mechanisms that can cause the star's intensity to vary in a pattern? We only know about our own star's sunspots, and the longer term cycle (11 years) in which the sunspots change the intensity at which it emits. How do we know that a smaller, much older star doesn't have a sunspot type cycle that is shorter or more complex, and that is what is causing this star's intensity to change?

Please refer to the Kepler FAQ

Planetary transits have durations of a few hours to less than a day. The measured solar variability on this time scale is 1 part 100,000 (10 ppm) as compared to an Earth-size transit of 1 part in 12,000 (80 ppm). Even then, most of the variability is in the UV, which is excluded from the measurements by the Kepler Mission.

Also concerning stellar variablity...

Even for the Sun - a star of low rotation rate and relatively evenly distributed active regions (in longitude) - variability is concentrated at time scales comparable to the rotational period. Fortunately, the time scales of interest to planet detection are considerably shorter.

One would hope that we can have enough faith in our friends at Nasa that they would do their homework (rather than just surf a few sites on the internet before launching a 1/2 billion dollar mission)...

Comment Re:That's a lot of lifetimes (Score 3, Informative) 59

Sort of. Haley's comet only comes around every 75 years, so for most of us that's a once-in-a-lifetime thing.

However, there are oodles of asteroids and comets out there, so in general you will have plenty of opportunities in your lifetime to see some. So feel free to get some sleep tonight if you need to.

AFAIK, these things don't happen too often. The next big asteroid viewing opportunity is likely to be in 2027 when 1999-AN10 makes a near pass (and should be brighter than 2004-BL86). Although asteroid 2004-BL86 will revisit our neighborhood in 2050, it won't be as close as it will be tonight for another 200 years...

Comment Re:Plot synopsis (Score 1) 138

You forgot the plot point where Kirk seduces and makes love to some sexy 80's icon girl, creating a time paradox baby that grows up and can be used in #14.

Key scene in #14: Daughter confronts Kirk (his father) and, as the camera is zoomed close up to her face, Kaley Cuoco screams "DAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAADDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD"

FTFY... Wouldn't be the first time a movie was inspired by a cheezy advert...

Comment Re:Mental note: (Score 4, Interesting) 180

Mental note: When establishing a questionably legal site for definitely illegal transactions to be made through, don't keep any logs about it, nor your conversations regarding it.

Observation: if you have a big enough ego to think you can create such a questionable site and get away with it, you have probably can't stop yourself from feeling invincible in whatever you do and dismiss any possibility that your logs will get compromised *ever*. Conversely, if have enough doubt about the eventual security of your logs in the event you might eventually get caught, you probably don't have the balls to go through with it in the first place...

Slashdot Top Deals

I have hardly ever known a mathematician who was capable of reasoning. -- Plato

Working...