Comment Re:Sarkeesian, really? (Score 1) 299
For me it's hard to pick between her and Snowden.
I think you meant Julian Assange.
For me it's hard to pick between her and Snowden.
I think you meant Julian Assange.
They believe Google exists to make money. No, Google exists to make cool things. The money is a means to an end.
would he just shrug and accept his fate?
No, because those mercenaries would be acting like a government that is taxing him, and that would make them evil. He'd have to make a second Galt's Gulch island to protest his first island's statistism.
Feminists are always saying there are no mental differences in men in women. And because of that, the gender disparity in CS must be due to sexism.
Now they're altering the content of CS curriculum to appeal to women, and it is apparently working.
So if women do actually need to be taught CS differently, why is all that dark matter sexism still necessary to explain it?
I very much appreciate my education for having taught me a great deal about abstraction, critical thinking, research, communication
Paging Dunning Kruger, Dunning Kruger, please pick up the white courtesy phone.
Feminists are trying to censor video games. And I don't suppose it is a coincidence that the petition was about a game and an issue Sarkeesian focused on recently.
lol, what the hell do you think refusing to change seats is?
Escalation is the only thing that changes things. Maybe what this country needs is a white nerd to get murdered by a cop. Maybe then the right wingers will be like "Oh, shit, you mean the cop problem is real?"
Then again, the "am I free to go" guy gets ridiculed by the social justice types. They want to pretend that civil libertarians are all bravado, but when those civil libertarians routinely cash the checks their mouths write, somehow they're still in the wrong.
What a bunch of chumps. They should have followed the smart people and put their money into Star Citizen, which totally isn't a cult or Ponzi scheme.
Firstly no one's forced anything on anyone.
I'm sorry, you're right, that's a huge difference. It's like getting mad that some guy is publicly "considering" raping someone. It's not the same as actual rape.
Moving the goalpost? You'd first have to make a counter-argument for that. Unless you're actually asserting that governments never engage in nanny-state boondoggles over trivial issues, which is laughable.
No, the goalposts have stayed put, but I have scored two touchdowns. You conceded that the feminist concerns over sexism in video games are trivial:
This argument is even more trivial than what they're doing and yet here you are.
and now you just implicitly agreed that "forcing" sexism labels on video games is bad thing, by telling me they haven't actually done it yet, as if I were overstating the grievance.
Apparently you're allowed to do pointeless, trivial things yourself but they are not. Hypocrite!
Let me know when a first world government takes up one of my hobbies and forces it on an industry. 'Cause that would be awesome!
I hope it is SETI. Fuckin' Proxmire ruined SETI. We need a tax on sci-fi movies to fund SETI.
Are you basically saying that these people should go out and stop abortion clinics being closed rather than do sociology?
The fact that you believe their whining about video games constitutes a science is not flattering to that science.
I'm saying that all the sexism in all the video games ever made has not hurt women more than the closing of any single abortion clinic where a clinic is needed. How much more explicitly do I need to state it?
And you know it is true. You won't deny it, because you would be a pretty shitty "ally" for feminism if you dismissed actual suffering in favor of internet feels suffering.
And I'm not telling them what they should be doing, I'm demonstrating how vacuous their cause is, how duplicitous their motives are, for focusing on something so utterly trivial in the grand scheme of things. They do not actually care about the plight of women, they care about the promotion of an ideology and an identity that hijacks the plight of women to fuel their ego gratification.
People have a right to make sexist video games. People have a right to play sexist video games. So what do they hope to accomplish by creating a lynch mob mentality over video games? It won't even stop sexist video games from being made. What it does do is give them an excuse to pat themselves on the back, claim credit when some studio or some website is a cajoled into appeasing them. They are petty tyrants looking for power to wield.
It would be disingenuous to suggest that sexism does not primarily impact women negatively.
It would be disingenuous to suggest that all the sexism in all the video game ever made impacts women more negatively than the closing of a single abortion clinic where one is needed.
SJWs need to get the fuck over themselves.
More like Incredibles themed than WoW themed, but with "technology" instead of superpowers.
And why does it have a backstory shoe-horned into it away? How is that supposed to translate into "capture the flag" or whatever?
Understanding is always the understanding of a smaller problem in relation to a bigger problem. -- P.D. Ouspensky