Once again the chicken littles are squawking,
Of course once again beginning by making a double fallacy, combining argumentum ad populum and argumentum ab auctoritate.
The one where the authorities of their secret sect of cargo cult science, only choose those novitiates that know how to sprinkly tea leaves over tree rings and determine the global climate from a plant that has moved at most a few inches, and how to use the magic trick of hiding the decline.
Because history proves that the best way for science to proceed is to push out all dissenting opinions.
OH and ignoring the opinions of a bunch of people whose very lively hood depends on the climate. Of course the high priests don't know what a lively hood is, living off of their tithes to recite their mystical incantations.