Comment i like (Score 1) 1
I like the idea of using gas but of course the problem,as always ,is getting up there without causing more pollution due to failed launches .
Comment very interesting (Score 1) 1
I hope I will to be Radiation Therapist. Thanks for the article.
Comment very great (Score 1) 1
very great information. I've bookmark it
Comment take your eco 2.0 (Score 1) 3
we need a new idea. Eco 3.0 . It is not electric car. It will be horse! Nature will be healthy!
Comment google aim (Score 1) 1
Google have only one full aim. It's bring value to people. And some hints and features are realizing.
Comment yeah (Score 1) 2
so wat is the Panda both sides but ya it is so awesome that this game came out blizzard should make one about monkeys or somthin like do u kno wat i mean but ya wat do i kno im just a teen
Comment default (Score 1) 1
Maybe you can try to spend some money to buy good desigh for you blog? Default Wordress theme don't attract almost people
Comment agree (Score 1) 118
zippo01 +1. Friend, I full agree with you!
Submission + - Google Says It Won't 'Manually' Review YouTube Vids for Infringement (wired.com) 1
thomst writes: David Kravets of Wired's Threat Level blog reports that Google has clarified its change in policy on automatic takedowns of YouTube videos for copyright infringement. On Wednesday, Thabet Alfishawi, rights management product manager for YouTube, said in a blog post that Google had "improved the algorithms that identify potentially invalid claims. We stop these claims from automatically affecting user videos and place them in a queue to be manually reviewed.” In its clarification, Google now says that videos flagged by its Content ID algorithm will be placed in a queue for "content owners" to review, if they decide to do so. In other words, the "manual review" is entirely optional, and the review, if any, will be done by the "content owner", rather than by Google itself — all of which begs the classic question, "Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"
