The former latter.

Google deserves all of its fame. They delivered a supperior product

And that is exactly why I always turn to Google for my supper needs. Nobody does supper better than Google, they really make the supperiest product which makes my mouth water with anticipation every time.

So if I buy a $2,000 computer the store pays $49.50 in credit card fees?

Tying shoes?
There IS an app for that. Several actually.

You just know that's how those kids will learn it.

They require you to use their credit card payment "vendor". Yeah that word has quotes in their description, so I'm sure Turbotax owns it somehow.

"Vender" charges 2.49% of your tax expenses just to let you pay online. So what should cost $0.25 to swipe a credit card online can be quite a lot depending on your payment.

Bye Turbotax. Also with their lobbying shenanigans and attempts to keep the tax code complicated they've just gotten higher than Comcast on my list.

He must be related to the Nelson Mandela funeral interpreter.

So "shambles" means user supplied data...
eating it without question means not validating it before use...

1 Cor. 10:25 "Whatsoever is sold in the shambles, that eat, asking no question for conscience sake"

then.. uhhh...
Wait.. is this a GOOD thing??

Use the allocated funds to remove the radioactive components.

Then simply dial 1-800-GOT-JUNK and they'll take care of the rest.

Mein Fuher! I can walk!

I managed to right a dissertation on MacWrite back in 93 without ever once thinking it needed more functionality.

I'm guessing it didn't include a spell checker?

Nor a grammar checker I'm guessing.

Who the heck is Platon?

They actually removed features from the desktop versions to achieve parity and then reintroduced them in lock-step.

Sounds neat but doesn't solve my JSON problems.

One project might use "customer" another "client" or "businessname". Each of these may have a "description", "overview", "synopsis" and a "type"/"kind"/"businesstype" field.

So code discovery of data doesn't work unless we have agreed to standardized field names in advance, but now there's always exceptions to look out for and name conflicts.

Now even if we know the names of every field, how do we know exactly what sort of data will be returned? A name alone is nothing unless we can ensure its type, and remove all assumptions about what it can contain.

Exploited or not, if one is trying to start out as a programmer and nobody is willing to hire, what choice do they have?

I still see "Junior" level jobs requiring 3 to 5 years in every acronym under the sun.

Self-proclaimed geeks and nerds supporting and defending Google - sad and mind-boggling.

Sounds like a "No true Scotsman" argument you've got there.