No, sir, this is a perfectly normal situation. Let me tell you, comple-te-ly normal. We even are not reading it in the news, actually, I have just dreamed it. The power that jackass cops and MacDonalds cops like the TSA or this lady think they have is completely out of bounds. I hope the guy sues her ass and her company out of orbit actually, and I would donate for a fund for that. Heck, I also hope EFF steps up and goes to court pro-bono. And that is why in the nearest future I wont travel to the USA, civil liberties are being squashed - and because of sheep like you that think an employee of an airline is liable to take out of a flight a dad and two kids because she did not like something. This time was a tweet in Internet, next time was maybe because she did not like something the guy said, or a comment some lady said about her backside or her boobs, or because some guy looked sideways...Are you for real?

Yep, split DNS fixes a lot of headaches, and "optimizes" a lot of internal traffic. No need for the traffic to go to firewall to talk to a NAT IP and come back to the internal network.

And to break far more easily the encrypted traffic.

In a university, *for* internal sites, they can distribute the root certificate to desktop via AD logins for instance, or putting it on a site. Profiles are also a way. They can be distributed in profiles say for wifi use, and it is debatable whether using a private CA for wifi authentication is actually more secure.

Because the whole certificate chain of trust business is a sham, so let be stupid and waste money on your private network too.

And a sleazy enough lawyer could very well get Unlawfully computer tampering, due to the coercion and circumstances , she could as well have pushed the button to delete the tweet.

And you are brainwashed by too many pushy cop moves in CSI movies. Delaying a flight, misuse of emergency mechanisms, abuse of power, impersonating an agent of authority, interfering with the flight of passengers, threatening an adult and two minors, and putting minors in risk. And putting flights operations in risk if delaying a flight. Now go to the barn, do not pass go, do not collect $200.

A flaw is maybe not being nice or snarky. This is criminal behaviour. It is not everyday someone interferes with the flight of a customer and threatens him and a couple of kids.

At least one asshat can and should be let go.

I would fire the agent for starters, and whoever was involved.

I can relate that I would not push a darn button 41 (!) times.

I have received a couple of years ago a dozen emails with messages of account terminations-or-you-have-to-click here to review from "Apple" that looked like the real deal, and only at looking to the headers you would notice they were coming from someplace else, and where using strange URLs. If you were looking at the emails, they looked like the real deal.

If I could operate, I would do brain surgery because it looks fun and only takes a couple of minutes. If could flight a plance, I would like to do intercontinental flights because it looks fun and it might only take 15 minutes. And builds houses only takes a couple of days. meh

No, the problem is not being constructively criticised by women. The problem is their making it the plot of a movie, being melodramatic, snarky, more prone to playing mind games, and thinking they are smarter. And not liking when people cuts the crap and calls their bullshit directly.

Shit, what neighbourhood do you live to have people show at your door with batS?