the phrase 'The use of any portable electronic equipment while the aircraft is taxiing, during takeoff and climb, or during approach and landing,' is as ubiquitous
I've never heard that phrase before. usually they say somethigna bout the devices not being allowed, tho.
if the board had any balls/lady-balls they would all resign en masse, I would bring in bill campbell for one, and definitely tim cook.
if she had time, then she could have led a big turnaround. she just didnt have time to articulate her vision.similar for her star-crossed run for senate.
why? because slashdot constantly silences dissenting voices by modding them down into oblivion. if you don't like what somebody says, then just mark them troll until all their posts have -1! that way nobody needs to see them. I'm sorry, but I refuse to bow to the gods of google, android, bitcoin, assange, and anonymous. i'm not going to let others silence me, nor am I going to soften my tone to appease the moderators.
If I have to keep iterating accounts to keep my voice, then so be it!
Remember when Carli Fiorina was in charge at HP? She seemed to have a good vision, but was pushed out in boardroom drama. Then the whole board spying thing, then mark hurd and the lady friend.
I would fire the whole board and start fresh there. Get some good leadership at the top! start in WebOS. Even if it's not perfect, HP needs two sticks to rub together.
No, the range is the problem. I can ride farther on my bike than this car could drive. Also, if you ban everything but ZEVs (absurd), then people will prefer e-bikes, evs, etc.
also, I wouldn't count the CAVs as zero emissions, becasue the air compressors will be very dirty if they run on diesel, and they will be located in the city at refill points.
in short, compressed air is a shitty energy carrier, a full "gas" tank holds less than a half gallon of fuel equivalent, and the range is less than 50km in city driving. for the money they want to charge, they better sell a real car.
the problem is the technology doesn't work, and the people selling it are shysters. a related problem is there is not one single drivable prototype.
Here's the problem:
* compressed air is a horrible energy carrier, with energy density less than lead acid batteries. the entire storage tank holds less than a gallon of gasoline's worth.
* they lie about the range, but in realistic driving scenarios it's less than 50km.
who wants a car like that, especially for $10k? why not just get a real car?
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24826820/Compressed-Air-Vehicles-A-Drive-Cycle-Analysis-of-Vehicle-Performance-Environmental-Impacts-and-Economic-Costs
judges dont invalidate jury verdicts. the jury listened for threew eeks and made a judgment. thats what juries do. if apple or samsung didn't want to face the judgment of Joe Juror, they should have put on their big boy pants and struck a deal.
Man, all the moderators suck.no matter if I have a pro apple comment or an anti apple comment, it all gets modded troll
Finally! Apple gets a taste of its own medicine!
Umm onlive is free, so maybe you're the one that needs to get his facts checked.
as i said in another thread, it's ok to get a mac cuz you can still play the PC games using onlive. so win, win ok?
What is craplive?
You can use the onlive to play pc gmes on the Mac.
So you think that money is the root of all evil. Have you ever asked what is the root of money? -- Ayn Rand
