Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:So good that the proxy battle is over (Score 1) 69

This is the exact opposite of the truth. Amazon allowed ebooks as low as 99 cents, the itunes price fixing explicitly prevented that from being a possibility.

So there were no more ebooks at Amazon for 99 cents? Prove it or we know you are lying.

BTW, there are Books on the iBook Store for 99 cents. Obviously Apple only keeps Amazon from selling ebooks cheap. It's fucking magic.

Comment Re: OH GOODY (Score 1) 203

You should know that the $14 billion is for all Samsung Electronics products, everything from TV's to speakers to DVD players to car audio. It also covers things like sports team sponsorships (local and national). Of that $14 billion, only $401 Million was spent on phone advertising,

Way to prove your point by mixing world wide spending with US spending, deliberately or not.

Comment Re:How about paying taxes first. (Score 1) 69

Most Americans pay their fair share. Couple weasels who hate America think they are so smart, creating and using tax loopholes for their own benefit.

Not surprise here, seeing Saudis, Russian and American oligarchs vacationing together and sending kids to the same Swiss schools. For them USA is just a place to suck money from.

Errm, apart from the fact that Apple does pay billion in US taxes - you also want rich people around the world to pay US taxes?

Comment Re:Heh... (Score 1) 110

While it is technically true that both sides have some non-zero amount of money, one side has enough of it to afford the worlds biggest PR firm along with 4 companies in the Fortune 10 (that would be 4 of the top 10 US companies by revenue.

Oh, give me a frigging break. Yes, energy companies (not just oil) spent millions of dollars on research and campaigns contrary to global warming alarmism. Some estimates go as high as $40 and even $50 million. But according to a recent GAO report, our own government spent $106 Billion dollars on "climate change" research, and that was by 2010, 4 years ago.

Nowhere in that report does that number show up. And oddly enough, the biggest share of the money spend by far (even more than the money going to NASA, IOW weather satellites and sending them into space) is going to the Department of Energy. Including research into better ways to burn fossil fuels and "climate change" unrelated things like "energy conservation" and "electricity delivery".

Comment Re:What about Free and no in-app purchases? (Score 1) 103

Changing "free" to "get" is removing information from the consumer. "Get" applies to apps that aren't free, too. "Free" means "get" and "you don't have to pay to get"; "get" simply means "click this to get the app" -- what you pay for it is revealed later.

Nope. "Get" is only for apps you can get without paying. If the app costs money to "get", you have to click on the amount it costs.

Slashdot Top Deals

Anyone can make an omelet with eggs. The trick is to make one with none.

Working...