Bitcoin does potetially weaken the power of central banks and governments, transfering it back to the people, the way it was for thousands of years. Is it an outright threat? Only if your goal is to control people through virtual currency, and maintain the power to transfer wealth from the people to the government without the people being able to oppose it by printing money.
Interestingly, while we compare it to western banking, it really undercuts more corrupt regimes that try to boalster their self-inflating currencies by putting up roadblocks to currency trade... e.g., Argentina's heavy restrictions on purchasing US Dollars with pesos in order to continue the wealth transfer to the government through currency inflation money printing. You'd think that western governments would be a bit more supportive of a decentralized virtual currency that helps people in countries like that.
Perhaps people should just tell the ECB it is like a game currency (Linden dollars)...
GPL has power? lol. j/k
This isn't a court of law. This is
I do consider financial impact to be a higher morale ground than "they liked my videos, and found another use for it." So, now that he indicated that he lost the potential for revenue on YouTube (albeit $0.04 if he's lucky), I can sympathize a tad more.
Despite losing potential ad revenue, it is clear that he fired the first shot that brought YouTube's algorithms into it, and, as I understand it, would not of likely of had ANY financial risk if he just let this other organization show off his great videos.
Poster's initial action bringing YouTube into the conflict: "Ultimately I filed a DMCA takedown request via YouTube's site, it's as easy as filling in a form and the video was removed."
The supreme court could rule this as unconstutional. In comparing free speech cases, the supreme court will oppose laws that create a 'chill on free speech'. In fact, this is the most common arguement today for overturning laws to protect free speech rights. Does the constitution mention "chills"? No. It is inherently understood as necessary.
The arguement I'd make is that by publicizing how a voter voted, they create a chill on voting. Because people know that potential employers could one day find how they voted in an online database when they did a search for their name, and might have internalized prejudice when viewing howing the person voted, people will increasingly become afraid to vote for fear it can impact opportunities in the future. This creates a chill on voting. If voting is a constitutional right, then laws that unnecessarily create this chill are unconstitutional.
I won't defend US copyright pursuits, but at least here you can share an open wifi with people if you want without some judge (and the lawmakers) treating you like a criminal or an idiot who deserves a fine.
I'd still like to fine France for being a dumb ass country for thinking that sharing internet access with neighbors should be illegal.
No matter which OS a person prefers:
So, if a person is only an expert in just Windows, with no experience outside it, to counter this very clear potential limitation, they need to demonstrate an inclination and abiltiy to learn *nix, understand hardware, networking, etc,...
Innovator: "if we make the corners of the windows round..."
Manager: "round? what's that?"
Innovator: "it is not square. you know. it would not have a point."
Manager: "if it has no point, then what's the point."
Innovator: "well, round corners are less likely to crack"
Manager: "yeah, but what are round corners."
Innovator: "well, your dog's hips have round corners. There's no shart point or tip."
Manager: "Oh. OK. So, you are saying that if we shape windows like dogs' hips, the windows will be stronger?"
Innovator: "Yes."
Manager: "Are dog's hips stronger because they have round corners?"
Innovator: "I don't know."
I'd really like to see better HTML 5 games, so start there. HTML is pretty easy to begin. Then Javascript. Then CSS. Then you can get into all the new kool stuff like WebGL, which you'll need to create games with it.
This will permit you to create games that can be run on just about any computer and OS, and possibly a large breadth of devices, such as tablets or large screen phones.
This is tricky, because we certainly don't want our personal fun use of drones to be criminalized in any law, but we do want clear restrains on government and other forms of invasion of privacy.
The question I have is, if you're sitting on 3000 acres of land, you can probably use a jamming device without impacting your neighbor's cable reception. So, what type of jamming would impact a drone?
"The four building blocks of the universe are fire, water, gravel and vinyl." -- Dave Barry