As usual it was Apple coming in doing something people have done before, only much better.
Apple's implementations "look" better than the competition. It's kind of like having a beauty contest where the winner isn't the brainiest but the cutest kid on the ramp. Example: the lack of a built-in hardware keyboard on the iPhone.
Some may call drone strikes terrorism but I do not. In my mind the difference is intent.
"The road to hell is paved with good intentions."
I can hear an al-Qaeda leader having the same debate in his head. Okay, he's more radical with what he thinks is the solution to the damage inflicted on Islam by the US (e.g. "corrupting" the minds of the Islamic youth). But that's why he's a radical. To his own twisted mind, his intentions are "good".
Other posters have already mentioned the way the founders of al-Qaeda (or maybe al-Qaeda itself in an earlier incarnation) received assistance from the US military. The intentions at the time were arguably "good", stopping the spread of Soviet influence in countries like Afghanistan.
Ultimately, it's the consequences that matter. When drone strikes or nuclear bombs kill far too many civilians, then maybe it's time to change the means, the tools used to carry out your intent.
It makes it an absolute pain to figure any settings out for someone else unless you have the exact same phone.
If that's true, then smartphones have become the new PCs. Only smart people can (con)figure them (out). But really what's so hard about a smartphone once you know that the World icon obviously means World Wide Web, while the thing that looks like a window means, rather less obviously, Applications?
With speeds now comparable to DDR memory, what's to stop blank USB sticks being used as a temporary RAM boost?
As soon as they get (at least) SSD-class wear levelling? Having noticed that my longest lived thumb drives tend to be the ones I don't use that often, I'm assuming that such drives aren't as durable as SSDs when it comes to rewrite operations. An SSD in a USB 3 thumb drive form factor, now that would be something for an ultimate Linux Live Distro.
Lots of toys to fondle and play with!
I'd get a puppy or a teddy bear if I were you.
I'd say that this still has overall beneficial effect: people who view the company as their fief, rather than merely a convenient but disposable source of income at this particular moment, are far more likely to manage it well and look at long-term effects of what they're doing.
Having the company as your private empire may well have the opposite effect. Since effectively nobody can fire you, your only enemy being an overly ambitious relation, you have no incentive to do well on the job. On the other hand, if you're a hard worker, you may prefer to do things by the book, fearful of innovation, since you don't want to be known as the guy who ruined the family dynasty.
The difference in the east and the U.S.: the CEO is considered important but not necessarily above the other workers. In the U.S. they are in an ivory tower. That's a problem and that's what so much of us have a problem with.
Since we're both [citation needed], let me counter you with my own theory about why Asian CEOs appear to be less fabulously compensated. Many of the larger corporations in Asia tend to be family or at least clan-controlled. I mean, take a look at Microsoft and Apple. If Microsoft were an Asian corporation, Bill Gates IV or V would now be in charge. Apple would now be led by Steve Jobs's wife or sister. Similar to the way some US execs enjoy working for the pauperly sum of $1, Asian CEOs (I'm generalizing, okay?) are willing to work for much less than their US counterparts since it's the family business anyway.
Of course, Facebook is doing more or less the same thing. You probably just don't care as much, because Facebook was always doing it. You weren't using it anonymously in 1998, so your expectations are different.
One way to read that passage is that he got his dates horribly wrong (theFacebook started in 2004). I'm inclined to think it's a hint to another (anti)social networking site.
Isn't Ramadan a Muslim holiday? How is it "the country's holy month"?
Ramadan isn't the holiday, since it lasts more or less a month. Now even if you're not familiar with Islamic religious feasts, just imagine the consequences of an entire nation taking their vacation at the same time. The holiday (and holy day) is called Eid ul-Fitr, which marks the end of the Ramadan.
Eid ul-Fitr has been compared to Christmas. I think it's closer to Easter Sunday, since both holy days mark the end of some sort abstinence, Lent in the case of Easter. Nowadays fasting is a word not general associated with the Christmas season.
Technicalities and what-ifs do not change what the person likely intended and the way it is read by, well, pretty much everyone.
So what did the person who wrote it, intend? Do we punish people for what is effectively a thought crime? And "pretty much everyone" is a nice shorthand for groupthink. Just because everybody thinks so, it must be right?
That bottom area on Gnome 3 is one of its big flaws, I think. They display notifications there, but only when you hover your mouse over them.
I don't have a Gnome Shell instance at moment, so I'm not sure if that's the case. I do remember seeing notifications on the bottom area and on the top panel. Now, I'm not sure if the messages that appeared on the top panel were notifications or merely tooltips. Maybe that's what the Fedora folks were thinking, to separate the tooltips from the notifications. I prefer the notifications to pop up (automatically when important) not in a blank area, but near a recognizable screen element, say, a special icon or panel area.
Without life, Biology itself would be impossible.
