Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Powers the economy, eh? (Score 2, Informative) 172

"It gives a whole new meaning to the phrase "one for the road". Whisky, the spirit that powers the Scottish economy, is being used to develop a new biofuel which could be available at petrol pumps in a few years.

Whisky accounts for approximately £2bn of Scotland's £86.3bn GDP.

Nice try though. Check your references before making absurd generalizations like this one. (I'll bet you also didn't know that there are also large swaths of the country that neither produce nor consume Whisky in meaningful quantities. )

Comment Re:why? (Score 1) 209

You also you can't tax regular citizens because they might vote you out!

But by taxing work visas it looks like you are creating more jobs for Americans, while funding the borders, while reducing the deficit! Killing three birds with one stone!

You say "looks like." How is this not the case? IMHO, this reinforces the stated goals of the H1-B program, which is to attract exceptional talent to the US that can't be sourced domestically. If you're looking to hire a "rockstar,*" $2k is not a lot of money to drop. On the other hand, it might make a company think twice about hiring a foreign worker as a "grunt."

*Forgive me, I hate the term too, but it works here.

Comment Re:Nothing to do with Intel or Microsoft? (Score 1) 209

Microsoft has 90,000 employees. Intel has 83,000 at least. Considering that there are around 100,000 H1B recipients, you could place nearly all of them at just these two companies and they wouldn't have to pay a dime for any applications, since it would be less than 50% of their employment.

In other words, this is little more than a tempest in a teapot. Yeah, Microsoft and Intel are big companies who employ lots of people. However, as a fraction of the overall economy, they only make up a small portion. Immediately revoking all of the H1-B visas and deporting those workers would barely have a perceptible impact on unemployment figures.

According to the latest report, in July there were 6.6 million people who had been unemployed for more than 27 weeks, 8.5 million underemployed part-time workers, 1.2 million discouraged workers, and countless more underemployed full-timers. Cutting 100,000 from that figure would be little more than a drop in the barrel.

Comment Re:lulz (Score 4, Informative) 618

People were pissed because she was giving textbook answers to make it through the job interview with the Senate while everyone knows she's going to be an activist judge ruling off of her opinion because she has no practical experience.

[citation-needed]

"Everyone knows" is a shitty argument, and the "no practical experience" argument has been thoroughly debunked. True, she's never been a judge, but she's more than qualified, and if "everybody knew," she wouldn't have been confirmed -- 5 Republicans broke ranks and voted for her, whilst the current crop of Senate Dems are fairly moderate, and wouldn't vote to confirm a far-left activist in considerable numbers, particularly with an election cycle coming up.

Saying something doesn't make it true.

Comment Re:lulz (Score 4, Insightful) 618

The complaints were based on her record. Also, some of her terrible answers--she couldn't answer the question of whether or not the government has the power to tell you what to eat.

I'd say that it's a good thing for a supreme court nominee to not give off-the-cuff, kneejerk answers to a question that could have considerable legal repercussions.

Comment Re:Meh (Score 2, Insightful) 126

Meh for the average user, true. Nice to see RiM focusing back on business users without trying to introduce an "iPhone killer".

And how are they focusing on businesses moreso than they already do? It looks like they're missing the forest for the trees by rushing to include every new buzzword-laden technology (Social Feeds! Instant messaging! Facebook!) without actually understanding the underlying themes and trends. To me, that seems like the antithesis of "focusing on business users."

Also, why is it that businesses cannot benefit from the (considerably superior) graphical, processing, and multitouch capabilities of the current crop of Android and iOS devices?

Comment Re:WebKit (Score 2, Informative) 126

No kidding. Have you ever tried developing for the BlackBerry browser, or the Widget API, which uses the same rendering engine? Netscape 4 is literally more capable and standards-compliant by comparison. It's virtually unusable to do anything beyond bare basics with JavaScript or CSS (and even then, behavior is often inconsistent and unreliable).

The Widget API is also perplexing in its own right. Although it supposedly uses the same rendering engine, its implementation of the DOM is slightly different from the Browser's. In short: a nightmare.

Slashdot Top Deals

To do nothing is to be nothing.

Working...