High speed rail doesn't make much sense when you have continuous density, but does make sense when you have dense cities every 1-3 hours drive apart.

Which is the I-5 corridor.

It takes time to get the trains up to speed. Japan uses them for the same reason.

Um, 25 percent of the US population lives within 100 miles of the I-5 highway corridor in the West.

I think it does make sense. Just not in the tax-subsidized empty states.

As we all know, humans are not capable of traveling at speeds faster than 30 mph. It was common knowledge in the 18th Century.

Obviously hyperloops can't work either.

Now burn a Confederate flag to celebrate and let's move on.

In case you wondered.

RTFM. Try looking at pictures of any US city 100 years ago.

What do you see?

That's right. Bikes and streetcars.

No cars.

Not here. Advanced tech cities are ditching cars. Cars are a 19th Century solution using an outmoded power source.

If people know there is an 80 percent chance they will be stopped, forced to park their car, and not able to use that car for three days (72 hours), or any other car, they will stop doing certain risky things.

The certainty of an immediate penalty is more important than the severity of the penalty.

Stop molly-coddling car drivers. Most of the urban roads were built for bicycles and pedestrians originally.

And drones have shiny things and are viewed as intruders.

Think about that.

It's illegal to fly drones in much of my state, so be advised.

Agreed.

So say all Canadians.

Look, when you get to keep all the money you stole and pay a fine of 0.01 pct of the amount you stole, it's like a checking fee for being one day late.

Until we see real jail time for senior execs who signed off on these illegal actions, it's meaningless.

Inadequate testing? They've been not using transfats in the EU for DECADES.

Look, I get that you think testing only exists in the US, but that has never been true.