Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Facebook has products? (Score 3, Insightful) 236

I think you must be an optimist: They're no *less* evil than television networks, newspapers or Slashdot. (TV shows are sold to TV networks, i.e., the TV show is the product.) When organizations like this are private they (potentially) *can* retain the goals of their founders, but once they're public (and they're founders sell off their stock), they're *required* to try and make the biggest profit possible. They do this by selling certain demographics of eyeballs to certain advertisers. The user's attention is the product.

Comment Re:So much hatred for it... (Score 1) 230

Ah. Finally managed to track that down. I guess most of the stuff they're removing is stuff I either rarely or never use. I'm sure if one installed the Nautilus fork Nemo it would play nice with the rest of the GNOME desktop.

Comment Re:I have been using it for awhile (Score 1, Insightful) 230

Heh. So the GNOME haters are going to host an indefinite protest to try and drown out any GNOME-related discussion in verbal noise? Well that sounds super mature. The whole GNOME3 thing is a textbook case of the GPL serving one of its intended purposes: Letting the users fork the code if they don't like the direction the project is going. That happened. The fork is called Mate. There's no need for any more animosity.

Comment Re:I have been using it for awhile (Score 1, Insightful) 230

The Gnome team broke a bunch of stuff in the name of "progress" while removing useful features. Gee, I wonder why people had an adverse reaction. It's like they actually wanted to use their computer for applications instead of being forced to learn a new interface with less functionality.

... while also creating a very nice, slick, and minimalist workflow. Now almost every feature that was removed is either back in core (albeit adapted to the new desktop), available as an extension or as an option in gnome-tweak-tool. Now I'd understand if people were complaining about still missing feature XYZ or saying how the new workflow is less optimal than the old one for managing windows, but that's not what's happening. Instead there's a whole bunch of people who seem to take any GNOME article as a chance to complain loudly without citing any specifics and mention how they switched to something entirely different without even mentioning what it does better. That's why I characterized the complaints as "someone moved my food dish." No content, just barking.

Comment Re:But have they unwound the craziness? (Score 2) 230

Sorry for calling you a troll. There's just a lot of noise in this thread from GNOME3 haters and a total lack of specifics. It seems like most people have decided they hate GNOME3 and not much can change their mind. About removing functionality from the core for people to re-add as extensions: I have mixed feelings about that myself. That aside most of what you're looking for is definitely available as extensions if you do decide to try GNOME again:

not having a normal task bar down the bottom

Looks like Frippery Bottom Panel would do the trick.

not having a normal menu at the top

Axe menu looks awesome and I actually use it myself. There's also Frippery menu which looks more minimalist.

not having a decent range of applets to add to the top bar (which I can't put things on anyway, so I guess there's no point having applets if you've got nowhere to put them)

Yeah. Agreed there, but it's getting better. It's just that instead of applets they're extensions now, and they're not installed by default.

Nautilus having found new ways to strip out features where previously I thought they had hit rock bottom

Are you referring to the double-pane thing that they borrowed from mc that they recently removed?

Comment Re:Death March (Score 0) 230

And it would be worth having a big argument over, except that there's a relatively friendly app that can be used to install and change themes. I actually think that's a pretty reasonable choice on their part: Keep the themes out of their basic, streamlined config tool and let power users play as they see fit.

Comment Re:Could we hear from someone who has used it? (Score 1) 230

I haven't used 3.6 yet, but I find 3.4 to be relatively friendly for dev work, especially with a couple extensions and a couple trips to gnome-tweak-tool. One of the nice parts is that it works really well without having to use a mouse very much. They adopted the OSX-style alt+` to switch between windows in a single app. Also, using type-ahead find to launch or switch to apps is nice.

Comment Re:obligatory comments (Score 3, Informative) 230

Yup. I'm going to wait a bit for the themes and extensions I use to get updated for 3.6, but it's looking good so far. At this point it feels like pretty much all the functionality and options removed during the GNOME 2 -> 3 transition has been made available as an extension or exposed as an option via gnome-tweak-tool. Any favorite extensions that you can't live without? My favorites are:
- Axe menu extension (to put a nice "traditional" GNOME menu back in the top left)
- Maximus (to remove the titlebar on maximized windows) and Window Options (to make the window menu available from the panel)
- Tracker extension (to add file results to the type-ahead find search) and Journal extension (to add recent files to dock icon's right click menu)
- Calculator extension (to make the type-ahead find search perform calculations)

My current favorite theme is MediterraneanNight

Slashdot Top Deals

Beware of Programmers who carry screwdrivers. -- Leonard Brandwein

Working...