Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Humans? (Score 0) 206

You are missing the point, which is that working conditions don't have to be this bad. It wouldn't hurt the bottom line too much to treat the employees humanely, to not be constantly understaffed, to provide proper ergonomics, fair pay, good benefits, and to promote safety. For the rest of it, fuck you.

Comment Re:Humans? (Score 0) 206

In my mid-20s, before I went back to college, I worked in a grocery chain's fulfillment warehouse. The conditions were absolutely inhuman, it was a back-breaking job. Management made it worse by re-timing all of the performance goals to lower our pay. You had 8 seconds per location for picking and a short amount of travel time in between. That 8 seconds might be a few cases of toilet paper, or 250lbs of dog food. Then they would do things like trot out a "ringer", generally a long-time employee who had been promoted past picking to something higher-paying such as forklift operator. Then they would have this ringer do cherry-picked routes for a day, post the list of the week's performers, and claim that the rest of us weren't working hard enough. I know people who worked in Amazon's warehouse. The conditions there are just as bad if not worse. Oh, and get injured (not unlikely given just how physical the job is, and the long hours)? Get a lawyer, if you can afford it. Amazon will go to any length to fire you before they see you collect a dime in worker's comp. When you see Amazon's market share grow and grow, remember that it does so on the mistreatment of others. They should find another job? Not likely. These warehouses are usually placed in rural or disadvantaged areas where there are few employers.

Comment Re:In fairness to Scientology (Score -1, Flamebait) 628

I agree that the relatively young age of Scientology is a factor, but Islam isn't *that* old compared to some other faiths. Yet seem to be closing the atrocity gap with Judaism and Christianity pretty quickly. Scientologists want your money. Fundamentalist Muslims want to cut off your head, or blow you up. That's not a knock on only Muslims- Zionist Jews and fundamentalist Christians are pretty dam hateful too. Ask American abortion doctors, or Palestinians murdered in indiscriminate missile attacks.

Comment In fairness to Scientology (Score 1, Insightful) 628

Let me say first that I find Scientology repulsive and a particularly greasy form of pyramid scheme. However, compared to the Judeo-Christian-Islamic trinity, they are responsible for much less evil and far fewer deaths. Between those three religions you have tens of millions slaughtered in pointless wars over minor differences in doctrine. You have sexism that runs deep through the dogma of all three. You have churches who have officially sanctioned everything from genocide to sexually abusing children to slavery. This stuff isn't even in the distant past. I can find examples in the last century where each of these religions has committed terrible atrocities. Scientology is easy to hate because it is so ridiculous, so absurd, and generally unpopular. It's an easier target than Judaism, Christianity, or Islam. But if you really take a step back and look at the doctrine of those three faiths, they are equally as ridiculous.

Comment I thought the SCOTUS had become a political body. (Score 5, Insightful) 2416

Quite surprising to see Roberts cross the aisle on this decision. For all of its flaws (and there are many), the Affordable Care Act is a step in the right direction. Health care is one of the major issues of our time, and it's not realistic to suppose that a single piece of legislation can resolve it.

Slashdot Top Deals

Remember to say hello to your bank teller.

Working...