Comment Re:Apple's activity is criminal here, Palm's is le (Score 1) 656
If it isn't legal, it should be. A possible precedent would be terminals - either hardware or emulators - pretending to be VT100s.
If it isn't legal, it should be. A possible precedent would be terminals - either hardware or emulators - pretending to be VT100s.
Now that the US appears to be giving up on manned space exploration it's good to see other nations step up to the plate.
Two processors are used regardless of the licence. It just makes things easier from a hardware perspective to have one processor dedicated to the phone network functions and another to the UI and assorted programs.
I remember the Qt fun and games, yes. The LGPL will always be the *Library* GPL to me.
Fair enough, that's the way I understand the trade-offs too. I was just a little surprised to see no mention of the LGPL in your article and wondered if it was part of a sinister plot to deprecate the licence.
Any comments about the applicability of the LGPL? It used to be very popular in embedded systems.
"Intelligent people can disagree over the scope of Fair Use, but there is NOTHING more clearly covered than public speeches and comments...it is the basis by which journalists and bloggers do their jobs. Yet, Stallman is quite clearly arguing that Fair Use doesn't apply to his speeches and he has the power to dictate how you can watch/listen to them.
"Ninety percent of baseball is half mental." -- Yogi Berra