Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Anyone actually does this? (Score 1) 348

If you can retrieve whatever is on them, they are not broken!

Yawn.. please try to keep a disk with a bad motor. You might get it to spin up, you'll get your data - but the disk is still broken.

Looking at one of the shelves here in my home office, I spot 3x1tb, 4x500gb and 2x3tb disks that I can pop in if something breaks. The 3tb disks are spares for my FS.

I'm using the 1tb disks for backups(3x3x1tb) and haven't thrown out the 500gb ones as I don't think they're quite old enough for the trash just yet.

Comment Re:Anyone actually does this? (Score 1) 348

Yeah I looked at the data from google when they published it and it makes sense. I don't really worry about it though.

At home I take backups of the stuff I care about (sourcecode, pictures, video). I've had quite a few disks breaking on me through the years, but haven't lost any data I care about due to a disk that breaks down.

At work we have redundant backups both of data and vms. Backups are on disk inhouse, on disk in a second location and on tape in a second location.

Comment Re:Anyone actually does this? (Score 1) 348

nah, not running _that_ many at home anymore. Still I don't think I need more of them

2 laptops, two desktops, a mediabox and a fileserver. Only the Fileserver has more than a couple of tb of disks.

Fileserver uses raid 5, just in case. Desktops are striped SSD's, laptops uses single SSDs and my mediabox boots from an SD card.

I've got neither the time or interrest in testing my disks besides replacing them if they break.

Comment Re:Anyone actually does this? (Score 1) 348

I didn't really think I had to mention that I kept backups of my important stuff. Thought that was pretty much what everyone on slashdot did. As a hobby photographer I have monthly backups in 2+1 locations, one of my backups is even in another country :)

I'm ok with loosing my porn and pirated movie collection, though

Comment Anyone actually does this? (Score 1) 348

I havn't even considered testing my personal harddrives. If they break I try to retrieve whatever is on them, but I just buy new drives instead of spending any amount of time fixing them, never returned a disk - I just buy a couple of new ones whenever I need more space.

At work we're using properly configured SANs with 24x7 support, so I couldn't be arsed to test disks there either. We don't have multiple racks of disks, so I don't see any good reason to test everything.

If you're testing new diskdrives you must be really bored or very broke.

Comment Re:12 days a year, 100% pay (Score 1) 670

The payment is split between the company you work for and the public benefits we have here. I think my employer pays for the first week and after that it is split up depending on how long you've been sick. I think it works in much the same way as with the maternity/paternity leave.

I pay about 28% direct tax which I don't think is too bad considering what I get in return for it. My health insurance is ofcourse included in the taxes.

Although some people (not too many) abuse the system, it is widely considered to be a good thing.

Comment 12 days a year, 100% pay (Score 5, Informative) 670

Here in Norway it is required by law that every employee has the possibility to call in sick for 4x3 days per 12 months (not by calendar year). This is with 100% pay, no questions asked. If you're reall sick, and has to get sickleave, this will not count in on the 12 days as long as you get medical confirmation. Sickleave is also with 100% pay btw.

In addition every parent has the right to stay home when their kid/babysitter is sick, I believe that is upto 20 days a year. This is also with 100% pay.

A fun thing is also that if you get sick on your vacation days, you'll get replacement vacation days. This is only for the 5 weeks of required vacation, not the national holidays though.

Cloud

S. Carolina Supreme Court: Leaving Email In the Cloud Isn't Electronic Storage 112

New submitter Ibhuk writes "I leave my email stored online, as do many modern email users, particularly for services like Gmail with its ever-expanding storage limit. I don't bother downloading every email I receive. According to the South Carolina Supreme Court, this doesn't qualify as electronic storage. This means most email users are not protected by the Stored Communications Act. All your emails are fair game, so be careful what you write. From the article: 'This new decision creates a split with existing case law (Theofel v. Farey-Jones) as decided in a 2004 case decided by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. That decision found that an e-mail message that was received, read, and left on a server (rather than being deleted) did constitute storage "for purposes of backup protection," and therefore was also defined as being kept in "electronic storage." Legal scholars point to this judicial split as yet another reason why the Supreme Court (and/or Congress) should take up the issue of the Stored Communications Act.'"

Comment my story (Score 1) 867

redhat -> mandrake -> debian -> kubuntu -> sabayon -> arch

Mandrake was the first distro I used as a full-time desktop OS. Have been using debian on my servers "for ever"

Still trying out new distros in vm's fairly regulary, but I'm getting to old to dedicate hours every day just to play with it.

Slashdot Top Deals

One way to make your old car run better is to look up the price of a new model.

Working...