Comment Re:It was an app on a WORK-Issued Phone! (Score 2) 776
Page 3, line 26 and 27 and page 4, line 1 of the legal filing.
Page 3, line 26 and 27 and page 4, line 1 of the legal filing.
The article spells out that she was required to have the phone on her 24/7 as a condition of employment.
No one "wonders why"; we know exactly why. Years upon years of war and unfunded securities.
It doesn't when your panels are under twelve inches snow and and a couple inches of ice, which is when I tend to lose power.
Damaged cars, at least where I've lived, go to a local wrecking yard where they are parted out and crushed for scrap metal. It's not cost effective to send them elsewhere.
If you have something to say that can be said in 140 characters, you have nothing to say.
Hear hear.
Both sides can fuck off. Shut the hell up and go elsewhere.
Microsoft bought Nokia's devices and services unit, not the entire company.
There is no money in antidepressants. They are cheap as cheap can be genetics.
Zoloft, Celexa, Prozac and Paxil are all generic and $10/90 days virtually everywhere.
The whole of humanity, no. Most of humanity, yes.
I don't have a smartwatch and I'm not constantly pulling my phone out of my pocket.
You don't have to immediately respond to every vibrate/ring that comes along.
I've been disconnecting things, not connecting them. Not going to change directions.
Unless it's a non-profit, it's profit focused. If you work and get paid, you are profit focused.
In 50 years, at best.
Smart man.
It is easier to write an incorrect program than understand a correct one.