If there is a doomsday scenario, this is kind of akin to the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Svalbard_Global_Seed_Vault

I was in the process of writing a post about how physical protection means nothing and how the data would would have to be online to be useful anyway when it hit me. Backups. IMO this doesn't make sense as a "keep people out of my data" thing as much as a "I can't lose my data no matter what" thing.

Call me back when it's over 9000 GHz.

man, too bad it's pronounce guh-new otherwise it'd be nub fap.

Why not get a skylight? I mean aside from price.

I guess chromium doesn't support APNG I went to the comparison site (http://littlesvr.ca/apng/gif_vs_apng.html) and saw animated gifs vs static APNGs.

Mod parent up! I LOLed

As I read this I can't help myself from picturing that Austin Powers scene with doctor evil asking for 100 BILLION dollars.

Isn't THAT bad

"Usually these notices ask Google to get rid of links to pirate sites, but for some reason the cable network also wants Google to" OMG it just stopped AND THEY DIDN'T EVEN MENTION CAN

I don't see how a fair tax would do much of anything except lower tax revenue (unless jacked up to a very high percentage). A much more fair tax would be a flat income tax (with capital gains counted as regular income) with a certain "poverty" base being exempt. example: 20K poverty line (I'm just spitballing) and 10% tax. person A made 20K and pays no taxes. person B made 25K, so 25K - 20K = 5K *.1 = $500 person B pays $500 taxes. person C made a million + a million in capital gains (income) so 2M - 20K = 1.98M * .1 = $198K person C pays $198K in taxes.

Looks good except for the fact it has rear wheel drive.

"The chinaman [protocol] is not the issue here, Dude." If google gives up data to the NSA who gives a shit about the encryption involved in transporting that data to a google server? That's like saying "I'm using bittorrent to seed copyrighted info to a MPAA spy but I'm using full stream encryption, they'll never catch me TROLOLOLOLOL"

Fork it?