Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Strawman argument (Score 1) 739

You have a couple of entertaining alternatives to just "they're a dick", but it's a reach to say you're covering all cases and as such abuse is never an appropriate response.

As for the "anger towards the parents", if someone assaults me I should go and piss on their ancestor's grave? Exactly how far back do you take the parental responsibility?

"more" could easily include any number of legal remedies, like getting the cops to beat them up, assuming they're not a mentally disabled octogenarian on the loose from prison.

Comment Re:Could be a different route involved for the VPN (Score 1) 398

Would it be easier for you if you just changed the carrier from Interwebs to USPS?

Netflix sell you unlimited CD/s month, as long as you return one they'll send out another (there's some supply and sorting issues I believe but that's not the point)

USPS deliver what they're given as fast as they can, so generally you get something like a 3 day turn around on CDs.

Now USPS says "You know, you Netflix people are making more money than we thought you would, we'd like a piece of that. We can offer you a priority 3 day turn around your CDs for a small consideration, otherwise we might just experience some packet loss in the sorting room. Oh noes, your mail seems to be getting lost a lot, huh?"

Also in this analogy, USPS runs their own CD rental service...

Comment Re:Strawman argument (Score 3, Insightful) 739

You position holds true when dealing with a small child.

If some smears his own feces on a wall and they are:
- 2 years old; you scold them gently and clean them up first, then the wall.
- 20 years old; yeah... not so much. If a little abuse is all you get you're probably lucky.

You've asserted several times that people may not be abusive, and other people have run with some kind of silly argument that Linus isn't, but neither your assertion nor their tangent makes you right.

Comment Re:Customer service? (Score 1) 928

Yeah, I take 50+ flights a year at the moment, so I'm already being boarded first anyway. I've always got the window seat too just so I can get on early and get sorted out and not have to get up for late entries and toilet breaks, and I'm broad shouldered enough that the refreshment cart whacks me every time it goes past. Aisle means you get off 10 seconds earlier after standing in the aisle for 2-10 minutes, but at too high a cost :P

I'm happy with my luggage with or "forward" of me, but if it's as little as 2 rows behind you, you have to wait for the entire plane to disembark before people will be polite enough to let you get your bag, they're all in a mad rush to go wait at the luggage carousel. As you say, the stuff I need is with me under the seat.

Comment Re:Customer service? (Score 1) 928

Costs me zero to have 2 checked bags on my preferred airline. It's not because I'm cheap, it's because you don't actually fly.

If any of you wise wise people did as much flying as I do you'd probably have spent 2 days trying to get your checked bags back and understand the wisdom of having enough clothes in your carry-on to survive for a few days without your checked luggage.

Comment Re:Customer service? (Score 1) 928

Putting cameras and laptops in the overhead bin is an *awesome* way to get them destroyed by people dumping heavy bags on top of them, or balancing them on other bags so they smash into the head of the nearest passenger when the bins are opened. But yeah, "stretch out", lol, as if you can.

Comment Re:Customer service? (Score 4, Insightful) 928

TBH, the only reason I want to get on first is to make sure I can put my one bag in the overhead luggage, instead of getting on late and having to explain to a bunch of yahoos that their purse/satchel/gift/other trash belongs under the seat in front of them and not overhead blocking a bag that doesn't fit under the seat.

Submission + - newGOZ Spams Again - GameOver Zeus spam observed in the wild (malcovery.com)

GarWarner writes: Brendan Griffin over at Malcovery has posted a new story documenting two spam campaigns seen in the wild today that use the newGOZ Command & Control infrastructure. The first spam used the subject line "Subject: Fw: Credit Applicaiton" (sic) while the second campaign of the day used the subject line "Subject: Haun Welding Invoice". (Haun Welding is a real company in Syracuse, NY, obviously not associated with the malware.)

Four Command & Control servers, all generated by the Domain Generation Algorithm previously discussed, were observed in the wild today .. all resolving to the same IP addresses.

hmeyx8mxqrxe1uwcn5w1win68w[.]net
szaj031k3ha447pniqr1003qx6[.]org
1stze0f1u7of3z18wu4in5prafy[.]net
dwgu4j8n210w18spq9rsz0uzj[.]biz
178.211.41[.]246
211.108.69[.]117
4.30.111[.]88

(Square brackets added to prevent malware detectors from freaking out...)

If you have network traffic headed to any of these destinations, that would be a Very Bad Thing.

Question of the Day: The C&C's are certainly set up "Fast Flux Style" — they use a 300 second Time To Live, but have held the same IP hosts all day long. That's a change from the behavior observed July 10th by this botnet (shared here as ( http://it.slashdot.org/story/1... ). Theories on why are welcome . . .

Slashdot Top Deals

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...