I see your point, but I don't think we have time to develop anything else.
OK - I'll bite. Why not?
Is there a major war scheduled we don't want to be late for?
Is there an enemy superpower that will outstrip us militarily in a meaningful way if we don't get this plane fielded ASAP?
The youngest of the aircraft it is replacing went into initial production 34 years ago. That's like 120 years old in fighter aircraft years. The F-86 was in fighter service only 20 years. The planned retirement for the aircraft being replaced is fast approaching and extending that date will be expensive (if not impossible as in the AV8B's case). Could we keep flying what we have? Sure, but we are going to pay in logistics costs and readiness problems, not to mention that many of these aircraft are reaching the end of their airframe lives and will be forced into the scrapyard at higher and higher rates as time goes on.
So it's not a hard and fast, date sure, deadline, but a continued decline of readiness and increased maintenance time and attrition for what we are flying now. And it's time to start buying replacements to stay on plan and keep the mission readiness requirements. At this point, the F-35 is the only game in town, so we buy them, warts and all.
Now you can argue that we don't need to be as ready as we are and that we can stand having a fleet that is less available than previously planned, but neither you nor I are in a position to say with authority either way on that question. But this is really just disarmament, albeit a slower version of it.
We really have no viable choice but to fly the F-35 for now so we need these planes in production. ....
It was already argued that we could buy other NATO aircraft that are in production. This option is "viable" even if the U.S. Senators prefer to keep the pork at home.
If you cannot get Congress to fund your "viable" aircraft, it's a non-starter to argue for them. Sorry but the reality of the political situation makes doing what you suggest extremely unlikely to succeed and even if you could prove it would be better and cheaper, your idea will never "fly" so why waste time? You can moan about how this shouldn't be the case, how politics shouldn't decide the question all you want (and I may even agree with you), but it won't change the fact that it does.