Submission + - Who says NoSQL means no ACID?
rescrv writes: For the last decade, the
SQL vs. NoSQL argument has been a popular topic of discussion for
developers across the Internet. These discussions typically revolve
around ACID
vs. BASE or
a discussion of the merits of eventual
consistency. Most NoSQL systems advertise that their systems offer
eventual consistency as a feature, as if it is somehow
desirable to give up on solving the hard problems of distributed
computing. But is giving up on ACID and settling for eventual
consistency the right approach? Now that NoSQL systems have evolved to
the point that there are systems offering strong
consistency guarantees, it's time to revisit the decision to abandon
ACID.
A new NoSQL system called Warp offers the strong ACID guarantees of traditional SQL systems with the scalability and performance of NoSQL systems. Warp employs a new technique called linear transactions (PDF) to offer high performance transactions at scale. Preliminary benchmark results are impressive and show that Warp is comparable to HyperDex, the fastest key-value store available for comparison.
With it's unique design, high performance, and strong guarantees, Warp leads us to ask: Who says NoSQL means no ACID?
A new NoSQL system called Warp offers the strong ACID guarantees of traditional SQL systems with the scalability and performance of NoSQL systems. Warp employs a new technique called linear transactions (PDF) to offer high performance transactions at scale. Preliminary benchmark results are impressive and show that Warp is comparable to HyperDex, the fastest key-value store available for comparison.
With it's unique design, high performance, and strong guarantees, Warp leads us to ask: Who says NoSQL means no ACID?