way to cherry pick results and ignore the overall scores.
Let me read the article for you, if you don't believe me. Btw. there are no overall scores, there's just a biased conclusion.
Page 11 and 12 were simple examples, where there was a factor of two.
Page 1: no benchmarks
Page 2: Ubuntu is faster in three benchmarks, two ties
Page 3: Graphics, OSX wins
Page 4: Graphics, OSX wins
Page 5: Ubuntu loses in all SciMark benchmarks, wins in two others (once by a factor of 4)
Page 6: Ubuntu wins in Imagemagick (against 10.8) loses in Php compilation (but not by much)
Page 7: Ubuntu wins by a large margin twice, loses by a small margin twice
Page 8: Ubuntu wins by a large margin twice
Page 9: Ubuntu, tie, win, big win
Page 10: Graphics, OSX wins
Page 11: Tie, big win, big win, tie
Page 12: 4*Tie, big win
Page 13: Tie, win, win, lose/tie(12.04/12.10)
Page 14: Tie, big win, big win
Page 15: conclusions.
So let me tell you: All the "big wins" are DEVASTATING for OSX. They mean that you need to wait DOUBLE the time for your results.
I did not contest that OSX won graphics wise, but it is very clear that linux won the number crunching.