It's pretty easy to see the parallels between copyright infringent (the sharing of proprietary apps against the wishes of the original IP holder) and violating the GNU (the sharing of source code against the original wishes of the IP holder).
Well, yes. Violating the GPL is copyright infringement. It's not just similar, it's legally identical.
You're right, the term "theft" shouldn't be used here.
This is why I can't take these discussions seriously. It's because it has nothing to do with freedom, because everyone's rights aren't supported, and everything to do with the GNU political movement.
Could you give a concise definition of what you mean by "rights"?
From a freedom standpoint, the GPL does clearly involve a tradeoff between guaranteeing user freedom and weakening developer freedom. But it seems reasonable, given that the current legal situation allows (and defaults) to the opposite, where user/consumer rights are very limited. It's an attempt to maximize the overall freedom within the current legal system.
I have no comment on your overall point (not a Fox News fan myself), but you're just wrong on the facts. The suit was between New World Communications, a subsidiary of Fox Broadcasting Corp., a sister company of Fox News Corp (both owned by News Corp.) They both share the same trademark, but they're distinct.
It's like fanning anti-Justice Dept. sentiment by saying "the Justice Department sued..." when it was actually the EPA that did. It's just factually incorrect.
After Fox News won their argument in Florida...
If you're referring to the case I think you are, that wasn't Fox News. It was a local Fox affiliate's new show, which is completely different. Owned by a private company, affiliated with the Fox Network, which is a sister company to Fox News (but not the same).
A little bit ironic, in a post about facts and integrity.
The CM-7000? Out of curiosity, which other ones did you test?
Just tried it: it still has the Awesome Bar suggestions and all that personalization.
I'm talking about a temporary "clean mode" that gives you Firefox, minus your history and cookies and add-ons.
Is there a browser that offers a "presentation mode", that gives you a clean environment for demoing things to other people?
At the moment I just use a different browser, like Firefox for everyday browsing, and IE for demoing, but what if you need to run the same browser for both instances?
I'm not talking about porn here either, I just don't need people being distracted by my forum links and asinine web searches while I'm giving a presentation.
Really?
Do you want more?
Also, I should note that hiding a statistical artifact is not necessarily nefarious, e.g. if it's erroneous or if it's irrelevant, especially if the resulting chart is intended for other scientists who know full well that something is being removed or glossed over or excluded for whatever reason.
The conclusion over whether it's proper or not is to know the data and the "decline" that's being hidden: realclimate.org apparently does, and explained it.
I like F-Spot: the workflow is IMHO the best for casual photographers. It imports everything into its own folder and categorizes it by date based on EXIF data. Then you can use tags to organize them into logical sets (events, places, etc.).
I actually wish there was something equivalent on Windows. Picasa imports into dated folders based on the date you import them, not the date they were taken.
STATS.org has a nice, details, scientific-sounding article debunking a lot of anti-BPA reports out there, and appears to come from a legitimate source (George Mason Univ.).
I'm not a chemist/biologist/doctor, so I have a hard time judging whether the article is bunk or not.
Care to weigh in?
Kleeneness is next to Godelness.