They were sitting around at work, with porn magazines out in the open. Does that really not strike you in any way to be misogynistic?
Oh yeah, they hated women so much, they wanted to look at pictures of them naked.
We can only go by reported vulnerabilities - we have no data for unreported vulnerabilities, and claiming that there are fewer unreported vulnerabilities in the linux and bsd kernels than in the windows kernel is totally unprovable - it's "magic thinking".
No, it's a proven fact. Now you don't even know what you wrote. Hilarious. You've got yourself all in a tizzy.
Both should be scanned by the job site. Neither is encrypted, and both are being re-served to clients, so a scan should have been done.
If they were half as smart as they think they are, they'd demand plain text. It doesn't hide malware unless you save it to a file and double-click it. Who gives a shit about what font a resume is in? They can buy the layout.
That's what these morons get for demanding resumes in
Ah yes, the ultra-secure PDF, which has never been a vector for malware.
POTS lines will still accept pulse dialing pretty much everywhere even though it is rarely used.
A number of telcos have dropped it, though googling around, it's less than I thought.
Great points. A good topic for a philosophy course; but it's not computer science.
That's a wonderful response to a student who complains about the use of the image in an image processing class, but not a useful one here, where we are discussing the import of the issue.
Which I guess is why the Windows kernel is now more secure than either the Linux or BSD kernels. So, citation provided
I've already debunked the citation of this report when other people who failed to understand it cited it. That is a report on reported vulnerabilities. It says so right at the top of the chart. Now, go back and re-read my prior comment to understand why that is useless, and why you have failed.
If you want me to debunk any other crappy citations for you, I can do that. But if it gets to be a habit, I'm going to bill you.
I don't understand why phone companies don't just set a max for your bill and then shut you off if it goes over that,
Tee hee.
Your naivete is charming, but if you have testicles, count them after every future transaction
One possible excuse is "I would, but I can't afford real estate in the service area of cable or fiber." How would you respond to that?
I'd tell them to look into the possibility of wireless internet in their area. It usually still sucks compared even to DSL, but it's orders of magnitude better than dial-up — measurably so.
How can my cell phone have unlimited long distance (even when calling landline phones!) plus data plus texts for $40 and this poor SOB was getting drilled for $51 for inferior service?
We canned our AT&T line because it cost $51 without unlimited long distance, which would have been another ten bucks. Now we have VOIP for $8/mo plus a trivial amount per-minute.
When I moved into a new house, there was a problem with my landline, and it was randomly dialing numbers. Constantly.
Pulse dialing? Was this in the Ozarks, or just a long long time ago?
Google Fiber can't come soon enough!
It is astounding how bad our ISPs are that we are literally lining up and begging for data-warehouser Google to come along and insert themselves between us and the internet.
And I totally agree with you. I needs it, my precious.
I just keep finding that it doesn't support the hilariously ubiquitous hardware that I want to run it on, stuff that is agonizingly well-supported and -documented on Linux. I bought a CD and a Tee Shirt and then it shit all over itself trying to just deliver packets reliably between four eepro100s and then I gave up and went back to Linux and haven't regretted it since.
Maybe someday the PC hardware landscape will simplify to the point that OpenBSD can support a significant percentage of it, and then I'll give it another look.
Second, if you don't know how to detect this, you shouldn't be running servers
He's right. Armed with the knowledge that it lives in
However, if this shit is on your system, then you clearly shouldn't be running servers, because you are running antiques without proper supervision. Not running updates is seriously fringey behavior, especially when they are available free-of-charge.
Whoa dude, I froth regularly, and even I can see that you're overly frothy of late. Calm down, have some dip. It's only life.
"Protozoa are small, and bacteria are small, but viruses are smaller than the both put together."
