From what I can tell, they seem to accept none of that

That's pretty much bullshit since Uber pays for extra insurance for drivers, and screens them which means obviously Uber has some liability they are guarding against.

Where I live, to be a cab you need a commercial drivers license

Which is just a note that you have given the state extra money, of no actual value to anyone. Uber drivers have that though, just not UberX.

proper insurance

Which Uber provides.

regular vehicle inspections

UberX also makes sure you have a vehicle in good shape before you can drive

a tax license

Well THAT should stop the raping!

and are legally required to have a camera installed in your car.

Uber drivers are all tracked by GPS continuously and if they are smart have a camera in the car or voice recording app also. It's not magic.

Basically you've done no research and don't know what the hell you are talking about, but don't let that stop you from complaining.

I mentioned that once before, and was roundly shouted down... By people who noted that Uber in fact DOES do background checks.

They may have had a failing in this case, but it's the exception rather than a rule and a problem with the division in India, not generally.

If you don't like being shouted down perhaps do some research before speaking?

In the USA and Canada, the Sinclair ZX Spectrum did not exist.

In the U.S. I had a Timex-Sinclair 2068, which was basically the Spectrum but with some improvements.

It was a lot nicer to use and program for than the Timex-Sinclair 1000 (ZX-81), really a pretty solid machine and nice to program for.

It absolutely was a classic in every sense that the C64 was, just for a smaller group of people.

I agree that is some companies - I worked on things like that also.

But there are many, many smaller companies that need programmers where life is nothing like that. The great thing is that a competent programmer really can choose the kind of life that fits them best - some people actually fit in and like the environment you describe, but you can escape if not.

I posted what I did because I want younger developers to ponder the freedom they have and take advantage of it while it exists, and to really take themselves in a direction they want to go.

That's the really hard part though - getting an idea of where you want to go, and sometimes sitting at company for a while until you work that out makes sense.

If Apple had moved to a whitespace-active language I seriously would have switched to Android development.

Not even joking. I have used a lot of languages professionally and for fun, but I could not get past that aspect of Python and I can't see why such an insane design flaw would be any more tolerable in Nimrod.

It has so many dangers in terms of correctness and overlooked bugs...

There was one other language that bugged me in... Fortran... but at least there is only affected what was a comment, it didn't oversee control flow.

You are playing the ignorant doofus, seemingly you are not a programmer or you would realize the truth of what I say...

I'll let you have the last response so we can all laugh at you further, honestly you aren't worth any more time replying to.

pretty much presumes that you are an executive-level employee who sets his/her own hours

All coders do in reality, and there are enough job options you can control the flexibility you desire.

You just need to take advantage of the power you have.

Note that although many executives have power to "set hours" they also generally work a LOT of overtime too. I really see them as being similar to coders, more than most people realize.

in Apple's case, particularly

That is exactly backwards.

Apple needed to go forward with a new language, but no other language offers the kind of interoperability that Swift does, nor would any existing language designers have been willing to bend to make that happen.

In Apple's case they designed a modern language that you can use to the fullest, while at the same time having easy bridging to Objective-C so that developers (including Apple's developers!!) can chose a transition timeline that makes sense for what they are doing.

I know that increased productivity should in theory make life better for everybody, in practice wealth has been increasingly concentrated over the last few decades.

Having been to Africa and other really poor parts of the world, what you think of as "concentrated" looks like quality of living spread remarkably well over first world countries. So what if some people have an absurd amount of money?

In fact if you think about it, the stuff most people enjoy day to day, you aren't going to have a much better experience if you are rich. If you want an awesome laptop you can easily afford the same laptop a billionaire would use. If you want an iPhone you can max it out on a minimal salary.

You can have decent shelter, good food and a good life without a ton of money in most first world countries, in large part thanks to extensive infrastructure and rule of law. That looks pretty far from a model where all death is truly isolated and the well off are living in castles while you shovel pig shit and die of plague.

The first two root comments posted are both ad-hominem attacks on 60 Minutes.

Why would you not expect that when the summary questions the credibility of the person speaking against 60 minutes, while treating that organization as if they are utterly trustworthy?

People respond to lopsided arguments with corrections. Someone who agreed with the spin of the summary would not feel as compelled to post.

As winter hits the nation, more and more people will be activating wipers to clear off road spray... if "they" manage to get this virus into the mag-chloride solution it could mean millions are impacted.

They'll know where you live anyways. In the US, at least, you're required to keep your car's current registration card in the vehicle

I keep that in my wallet also, along with insurance.

DO NOT KEEP ADDRESSES IN YOUR CAR.

And if he keeps his driver's license in the car glove compartment, 90% of the time he doesn't need to carry that, either.

Very bad idea - if someone breaks into your car they know (a) you are not at home, (b) may have your garage door opener, and (c) thanks you your idea know where you live.

Do not keep anything with a home address in your car.

Google Wallet and the Google Wallet card have done this since release.

While interesting it's not a "real" credit card that most people would use - no rewards, can't use in many stores, non-geek family members will not use, etc.

ApplePay is just that and more to anyone without an iPhone 6.

First of all, people with iPhone 4s or above will be able to pay using the device when the Apple Watch launches. Even now some iPad models also work with ApplePay, because you can also use ApplePay for online purchases.

But - my post is about the benefits of using ApplePay to link to credit cards, even if you don't use the phone to pay. Any device can technically use ApplePay to hold card data, and receive notifications when the cards are used even if you are not there.

The phone and wallet don't have to be at war with each other, they cam complement each other quite well.

With Apple Pay in particular, there's one very good reason to link a card into that system even if you never intend to pay using the phone - you get push notifications when money is spent on the card linked to ApplePay, even if you just use the card itself to buy whatever.

While credit cards could do this with custom apps, I've not seen it done before (at least with credit - I'm pretty sure some banks were doing this already when payments were made from an account) - and it's really nice as a backup mechanism to know earlier rather than later if your CC number has been compromised, even wen using online.