Are DMCA Abuses a Temporary or Permanent Problem? 163
Regular Slashdot contributor Bennett Haselton wrote in with a story about the DMCA. He starts "On January 16, a man named Guntram Graef who invoked the Digital Millennium
Copyright Act to ask YouTube to remove a video of giant penises attacking
his wife's avatar/character in the virtual community "Second Life", retracted
the claim and stated that he now believes the video was not a copyright
violation. (He had sent similar notices to BoingBoing and the Sydney Morning Herald just for posting screen
shots of the video.) His statements
in a C-Net interview suggest that he didn't mean to alienate the
anti-censorship community and was probably angry over what he saw as a
sexually explicit attack on his wife. But the event sparked renewed debate
over the DMCA and what constitutes abuse of it. I sympathize with Graef
and I admire him for admitting an error, but I still think the incident
shows why the DMCA is a bad law." Hit that link below to read the rest of his story.