The damage has already been done to the project, there is no resurrecting it. You are done, it is over. Sorry to say it. But once you get a textbook MBA into the matter, it is over and there is no Resurrection for project. You will do well in your further endeavors, however this one has reached it's conclusion.

Oh you don't know how right you are. VERY well thought comment.

Goodbye RIM, no one will remember you in 3 years.

Ok *HERE* is the real problem with that (I will spuriously term that as) "logic". Those "other" countries are predominately run by either dictatorships (where is the logic in a dictatorship?), socialist agendas, or completely egregiously corrupt governments. *THAT* very fact alone should be enough to argue that the current governance is adequate.

If you really want to kill the internet, then by all means put it in the control of the UN. Show me any any project (thatis supposedly successful) that is run by the UN and I will show you corruption, extortion, and gang mentality. I would wager that I could also show you almost every other form of blasphemous egregious violation of human rights and offenses to freedom and democracy.

I have watched the video and (full disclosure) I have worked within the banking industry. I know for a fact that safes with solenoid unlocking devices are widely used. Either with a biometric or electronic numeric keypad method of unlocking. I also know that as one of the persons (formerly) responsible testing these devices, that this attack vector never occurred to me. And I'm talking about the picking up and dropping of it, primarily. Mostly because the safes in question are several hundred pounds and had to be delivered to my testing area on a forklift. And partly because if I did so the people of the floor beneath me would have freaked out and I would have had a talking to by my boss. But I'll bet you anything that you could lift up a corner of one of the small bank safes and drop it the same way. I would be surprised if that *DID NOT* work. Mostly considering that the companies that make those safes are as equally negligent in testing as the ones in the Forbes article.

HERE HERE! I too am a tall guy with big hands. I personally rebelled verbally against the tiny, dinky, toy-ish phone fad. I'm happy to see it lose steam and the market finally get some semblance of sanity. I like a touchscreen AND a keyboard. And I like a decent size touchscreen. Let's see more!

I've got $50 that says they get some corrupt corporate stooge judge to rule this as completely legal.

Ok I *may* not have understood exactly everything from the article, however it appears to me that this is really boron/carbon/beryllium fission not not fusion. Anyone else pick up on that? Or do I have it wrong?

Ok so if you can turn a flat surface into a speaker, which has been done. And you can cancel out the sound of a room to the outside using the same technique, which has been done. Why couldn't you just put a microphone on both sides of the surface and only cancel out the sound from one direction?

I think you mean MSNBC.

Oh now that's just wrong.

In regards to the perpetrator of the PSN attack.

1. The Master Control Program, who does he calculate he is??!
2. Sorry I put the new X-Files Collector edition BluRay in and it went crazy.
3. I for one welcome our new PSN overlords.
4. Still think Skynet isn't real??
5. The W.O.P.R. was running another simulation.

Let's start a pool and take bets on who the perpetrator is. I'll take Iran (just because it's a longshot) and the US government (just for the conspiracy factor).

Pure, unadulterated FUD. Plain and simple. Honestly is there anyone in the world that isn't smarter than a marketing person?