Comment Re:Really? (Score 1) 608
B) Barack Husein Obama staged the whole thing himself for sympathy, no doubt using his Muslim Atheist friends
Nono, Muslim Atheist Nazi Commie friends.
B) Barack Husein Obama staged the whole thing himself for sympathy, no doubt using his Muslim Atheist friends
Nono, Muslim Atheist Nazi Commie friends.
Due to the compiler chicken and egg problem, even analyzing excruciatingly the source code of a project doesn't mean it is 'safe', because even though the source code is safe, if your compiler is compromised (and can inject its infected code into the compiled version of any detected compilers), then your compiled binary might not be safe.
It takes a very careful inspection to determine if your compiler is affected.
Not even open source software is safe, see: Ken Thompson, etc.
Open Source stuff tends to be more secure because it has so many people looking at it, from many different perspectives, both professionals and amateurs, all working together to improve the code and make it more secure.
Why, exactly, did it take 2 years to discover the Debian SSL Keys weakness, then? If we have so many pouring over every aspect, why was this allowed to slip through, with a crippling bug that makes the very security and privacy of the internet something that can be easily broken? Why did it take so long?
It looks like this iteration won't even have a tracker, so, there will be no need to announce the tracker.
There being a lot of mining resources in bitcoin will always be important to the security and stability of bitcoin. This isn't a problem that you can just wish away to the cornstalks: if the total computing power used in bitcoin drops significantly, then there will be much less security, due to the ability of a malicious agent gaining 51% or more of the network's total computing power being able to double spend, etc.
Not really applicable if you browse on the SSL version of google, since your browser won't send the referrer over.
If RedHat has contributed any code to the source code, it becomes a shared copyright holder of that source code.
Could be argued? Yes.
Accurate? Probably not. They would then be responsible for everything that the federal government does for its citizens.
You have insurance on the money currently in your wallet? I'm referring to paper money.
If only I had mod points.
Obviously, this may require a restructuring and/or more headcount in various areas in the organization
Or, a head hunt against problematic users (which may include an overbearing CEO)
Still worthy of ridicule, due to the context of the statement. That you can, in just the right places, see Russia from Alaska does not equate to Foreign Policy experience.
Since I'm not one to voluntarily open up security holes, I'll stick to an educated guess.
The concept of self-propagation is lost on you, eh?
"Experience has proved that some people indeed know everything." -- Russell Baker