Not really applicable if you browse on the SSL version of google, since your browser won't send the referrer over.

If RedHat has contributed any code to the source code, it becomes a shared copyright holder of that source code.

Could be argued? Yes.

Accurate? Probably not. They would then be responsible for everything that the federal government does for its citizens.

You have insurance on the money currently in your wallet? I'm referring to paper money.

If only I had mod points.

Obviously, this may require a restructuring and/or more headcount in various areas in the organization

Or, a head hunt against problematic users (which may include an overbearing CEO)

Still worthy of ridicule, due to the context of the statement. That you can, in just the right places, see Russia from Alaska does not equate to Foreign Policy experience.

Since I'm not one to voluntarily open up security holes, I'll stick to an educated guess.

The concept of self-propagation is lost on you, eh?

Considering the sheer stupidly large amount of hits I get from compromised machines trying to SSH into my server, I'd say that there are linux viruses out there.

Unless the interview is recorded (by you), or you have corroborative evidence of some other form, it's going to be your word against theirs...and as everyone knows, HR is there to protect the company, not the employees.

For a state with zero employee protections (AR), at least we have the whole one party consent going on.

These are fairly common, actually.

Well, at least in the first steps of the malware - load a payload into memory that disables antivirus. Then you do the filesystem changes after the antivirus can no longer stop you.

Thus why antivirus isn't nearly as important as due diligence in using your computer. This means browsing without all of the fancy addons, generally. Or, at least, if you must have them, keep them up to date.

Wouldn't necessarily need to, if it's an infostealer type malware. It's already gotten what it needs to, doesn't matter if it gets rebooted - your passwords belong to the guy on the other end already.

The article writer probably made assumptions.

More likely, the hard drives had basic 'get connected, and this is what you do' kind of code - all of the actual data would have been on DB servers.

Though, this could have been a DB node...

If you've taken care of children for any reasonable amount of time, you don't recognize a difference in those two words.

Well, at least I can't.