It's interesting (as much as any of this is interesting :-/ ) how much space Pamela is now using to discuss Pamela, and to discuss the "attacks" on Groklaw.

Yes. More "attacks".

http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20040812070059503

• "An Enderle Blow by Blow
  
  Dated: Thursday, August 12 2004 @ 12:57 PM EDT

hmm..

What *really* got Pamela pissed off at me was my suggestion/question about whether OSRM was taking the information produced by the posters to Groklaw and incorporating that information into their "product".

That question generated several angry emails from her, and really (OK: IMHO..) was the cause of the famous Pamela-shaming:

http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20040804221510383

http://www.groklaw.net/comment.php?mode=display&sid=20040808231529208&title=trolls%20getting%20smarter&type=article&order=&hideanonymous=0&pid=181411#c181772

trolls getting smarter
Authored by: PJ on Tuesday, August 10 2004 @ 03:17 AM EDT

There are other ways to stay on top of the SCO versus world+dog scene without having to use Groklaw.

(And interestingly, these alternate methods are becoming faster at delivering the information than Groklaw is...)

Downside?

Going to the source requires a bit more reading, which implies that you have been|are going to|will from now on put a bit more effort into keeping up with what's going on.

I know it makes my head ache some times :-/

Having been on /. for what is now quite a while (although not posting very often for various reasons), and having been on Groklaw as talks_to_birds roughly since mid-winter, I thought maybe this might be a good forum to express my growing concerns about what's been going on at Groklaw, regarding:

1. censorship
2. intolerance
3. a group-think, shark-attack mentality
4. and the cult-of-personality that's grown up around Pamela Jones, and that is the cause o