Comment Re:Who's in charge? (Score 2) 279
No but The Doctor, of Doctor Who did previously play a WHO Dr.
No but The Doctor, of Doctor Who did previously play a WHO Dr.
why would Kmart even have your social security number?
Because they ask for it to look up your Sears credit card if you don't have it with you. Yes it is stupid
does buying the government count?
either a Williams X-Jet
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
or the Mallory astronautics hover bike (not the scale model they are selling to fund the full size)
or somewhere where people know what they are talking about go look at political compass and tell me I am wrong
http://www.politicalcompass.or...
Every time I hear that I think the same thing:
"Hey look, another knucklehead who doesn't actually pay attention to politics but says what ever group think crap he pulls out of his ass so he can feel important."
Really both sides want ongoing endless war in the middle east, both sides want to increases surveillance and move toward a police state, both parties side with big media, both sides want internet censorship,... need I go on. Its not crap when its true. Look at the debates what gets argued, abortion which has been in an endless stalemate since the 60s the. health care well some movement but not in a direction that anyone other than the insurance companies wanted, they argue about war in the middleast but both sides do the same thing go arm extremist topple government then go fight extremists that we armed earlier, controll/access has made no real movement either way. where is the real difference?
Your both wrong the democrats and the republicans are exactly the same. They are just two sides of a authoritarian expansionist kleptocratic coin.
I was carrying a smartphone 10 years ago, my new one is faster, prettier and better integrated, but does it do anything the other one couldn't... nope. Just polishing there, no innovation that I can see. In fact the battery life is significantly worse.
Yeah only back then we called them PDA's
Audrey Hudson, an award-winning journalist most recently at the Washington Times, told The Daily Signal she was awoken by her barking dog around 4:30 a.m. on Aug. 6, 2013, to discover armed government agents had descended on her property under the cover of darkness. The agents had a search warrant for her husband’s firearms. As they scoured the home, Hudson was read her Miranda rights.
While inside Hudson’s house, a U.S. Coast Guard agent confiscated documents that contained “confidential notes, draft articles, and other newsgathering materials” that Hudson never intended for anyone else to see. The documents included the identities of whistleblowers at the Department of Homeland Security. The Coast Guard is part of Homeland Security.
The settlement requires the government to return all documents, destroy all notes made from these papers, and promise it did not copy anything. Does anyone believe this?
It's not creepy if it works. It's kind of like real spam - try millions of times and if one works it pays off.
Dick pics/crude messages work for a subset of women as do really well thought out messages. But a really good message costs 30m-1h; a bad one
I wonder if there is actually a biological factor here?
Hear me out, the predominate male animal biological strategy is to inseminate as many females as possible, each insemination involves injecting millions of sperm after one or two eggs per female. Is it possible that this digital mating-dance-span as it were, is just a logical exstension of the biological stratagy.
Why should she not be simply because she is friends with the President? We see again that our Republican rulers do not treat us fairly.
Republican rulers?
Why should she not be simply because she is friends with the President?
Republican - I don't think that word means what you think it means.
isn't the cloud service provider for these phones technically in possession of all the kiddie porn anyway?
has this issue been resolved yet?
No they are protected by safe harbor laws one of the few good things to come out of the dmca
ah yes... but Child Pornography is a special kind of pornography. the definition is so broad its scary.
Section 2256 of Title 18, United States Code, defines child pornography as any visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct involving a minor (someone under 18 years of age). Visual depictions include photographs, videos, digital or computer generated images indistinguishable from an actual minor, and images created, adapted, or modified, but appear to depict an identifiable, actual minor. Undeveloped film, undeveloped videotape, and electronically stored data that can be converted into a visual image of child pornography are also deemed illegal visual depictions under federal law...
well with a single XOR instruction and the right arrangement of bytes in a mask you can turn any arbitrary file into any other arbitrary file child porn or otherwise. Thats it lets ban the use of the XOR operator, or any other arrangement of instructions logical/arithmetic operators that could be used to to emulate it...
If you have a procedure with 10 parameters, you probably missed some.
