Comment Re:track record (Score 1) 293
Also the A380 is pretty silly looking. Have you seen one? It's like a fat guppy.
Also the A380 is pretty silly looking. Have you seen one? It's like a fat guppy.
At some point, you have to start trusting people/organizations/companies.
What you're really saying is, "You don't have a choice, so just suck it up, princess. Privacy is so 20th century."
No, you don't have to trust people/organizations/companies who have not earned your trust. You are the one paying. Use the power you have as a consumer. Weaponize your purchasing power.
And always, always reserve the right to just say "Nope, I don't need it, I don't want it, and I'll find another way."
This will help ali baba. E-bay had the same problem. I've encountered dozens of fake scams on ali baba. Mostly for watches.
I can see a good BOHF episode answering this question.
The episodes have addressed it many times. In fact, both the article AND THE
The answer is easy enough: Halon satisfies their requirements, as do Halon substitutes. They work well for cooling and suppress fires. Halon discharges are a BOFH staple.
iFitit has them, although they are ruinously expensive. I expect they'll come down over time.
iFitix has them, although they are ruinously expensive. I expect they'll come down over time.
Soylent is often tastier.
I don't care how good it tastes. I'm not eating anything made of people!
azimuthally
Saying that word is like a party in my mouth.
This sounds promising. I could use a memory upgrade.
A better source for entangled photon pairs will come in handy for Quantum Cryptography, but Quantum Computing requires many entangled qubits.
There is no indication how these resonators could produce more than pair-wise entanglement, after all this is very different from the Josephson junction loops that D-Wave and the future Google chip are build on. These allow an arbitrary coupling via the magnetic flux (only restricted by the chip's geometry).
Regrettably, this just yet another poorly written pop-science article not informed by any actual knowledge of quantum information science. If I had a cent for each of them I'd be rich by now.
It's just a pity that all ioT talks different languages. If only there were a secure, simple protocol so that they could talk to each other...
SMNP would have worked, but it completely stupid in its ambition to be a superstandard....
I get the feeling we're witnessing the beginnings of a superhero origin story.
Mix in a little gene-splicing, some radiation and a brilliant but shy lab assistant who's working late one night. Next thing you know, Manhattan is in shambles.
And they use more burp and fart sound effects than all of Hollywood!
The old asterisk voice menu system I used to run was pretty good at shutting down telemarketers and robocallers while still letting legitimate callers through. I don't think it'd be so easy to implement on an android phone, although it really should be. Maybe that phone Canonical is working on will have more open standards, but I'm not holding my breath.
GRBs clearly haven't prevented life in *our* galaxy, so the Fermi Paradox still stands.
The caluculations probably rule out life in the core of our galaxy, but systems further out would be exposed even less often than ours is. And even though GRBs can periodically sterilize a planet, their directionality means that one burst would not likely sterilize all the planets in an intercellar civilization simultaneously.
So, to modify what someone said above, we can add another term to the Drake equation, but this doesn't do much to answer Fermi.
If all else fails, lower your standards.
