Isn't Junos a proprietary open source? I guess others could not use it. Am I not right?

and why not show those proof or at least one of them to public to prove the case?

The windows 7 start button did not do a huge work too. It brought a list of shortcuts (and a search for shortcuts).

It is a proprietary software with open source. It means you will pay at least $ 599 /year and the source is open to hackers for them to find bugs and exploit.

Could you tell us why in the hell I should contribute to such a thing?

Besides, it does not mean they can sustain the reaction for a long time.

I guess the reactions are still too short to be useful for energy production.

I would buy the surface 2 (the ARM version) if it was a Baytrail atom.

I am not interested in the pro (I have a PC for that) but I need a decent Baytrail tablet and Surface 2 could be it.

Same has been going on with Iranian scientists.

Iranian scientists which work for government organizations have been banned from publishing in American journals and those journals which do business in the US. As an example science direct and others.

Isn't that pure B.S.?

Very well said , thank you.

Most of the available boards including RaspberiPi are not suitable for embedded design experiments (that's my personal opinion though). I prefer to program low level I/O code using C or even assembly for such purposes than writing a linux code (which in the case of RaspberyPi is several giga bytes).

I guess older versions of Arduino used to be what I want. I bought a few cheap Chinese boards (ARM and AVR) from ebay a few years ago and they are exactly what I want.

Btw. I built my first radio (the circuit board using Acids and so on) in 5th grade and designed an FM transmitter in 8th grade. Even now at 40 I enjoy playing with these things as a hobby from time to time. Though I enjoy FPGA design as much. I somehow regret that I changed my field from electronics engineering to computer science for masters and PhD.

Iran has already done it. It has built an Intranet like network which connects to outside world through few gateways. The transition of the network users to the new Intranet is being done at the time being and will complete in year.

The main purpose is the:

1- Avoid the internal Iranian traffic to travel over the internet (i.e. unknown countries).
2- To control in/out traffic (deep packet inspection, control access to outsider websites, attack and spying control, allow access to Iran-only websites just from inside Iran, emergency kill switch).
3- Force Iranian organizations to host their website in Iranian data centers.
4- Save traffic costs.
5- Flourish local hosting and cloud business and local peering between ISPs. ....

What a kind title. How about apologizing (and kissing) each other and finishing things kindly!

How about using google to find out?

http://datawarehouse4u.info/OLTP-vs-OLAP.html

@Toad-san :

You see how denial of the existence of cows turned out? I guess you disappointed those sensitive creatures.

I just found it. It was called UKEU (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UKeU). It was a famous effort which ended in am ugly shutdown.

Didn't UK try to build an online university almost 7-8 years ago which ended in a disaster (millions of wasted money and eventual shutdown of the website) and house hearings?

They were supposed to provide masters courses for 6000 pounds but the costs exceeded the estimates and forced them to stop the whole thing.